Literature DB >> 24027436

The Effect of Budgetary Restrictions on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions.

Mehmet U S Ayvaci1, Oguzhan Alagoz, Elizabeth S Burnside.   

Abstract

We develop a finite-horizon discrete-time constrained Markov decision process (MDP) to model diagnostic decisions after mammography where we maximize the total expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of a patient under resource constraints. We use clinical data to estimate the parameters of the MDP model and solve it as a mixed-integer program. By repeating optimization for a sequence of budget levels, we calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios attributable to consecutive levels of funding and compare actual clinical practice with optimal decisions. We prove that the optimal value function is concave in the allocated budget. Comparing to actual clinical practice, using optimal thresholds for decision making may result in approximately 22% cost savings without sacrificing QALYs. Our analysis indicates short-term follow-ups are the immediate target for elimination when budget becomes a concern. Policy change is more drastic in the older age group with the increasing budget, yet the gains in total expected QALYs related to larger budgets are predominantly seen in younger women along with modest gains for older women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov decision processes; breast cancer; constrained MDPs; cost-effectiveness; diagnostic decisions; linear programming; mammography; medical decision making; mixed-integer programming; service operations

Year:  2012        PMID: 24027436      PMCID: PMC3767197          DOI: 10.1287/msom.1110.0371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Manuf Serv Oper Manag        ISSN: 1523-4614            Impact factor:   7.600


  51 in total

1.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.

Authors:  Jon M Greif
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  A vision of individualized medicine in the context of global health.

Authors:  D A Cortese
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Public health. Brawling over mammography.

Authors:  Eliot Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evidence-based breast cancer prevention: the importance of individual risk.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Breast biopsy utilization: a population-based study.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; L Joseph Melton; Vera J Suman; Clive S Grant; Sylvester Sterioff; Kathy R Brandt; Charles Branch; Thomas A Sellers; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-07-25

8.  Is age at diagnosis an independent prognostic factor for survival following breast cancer?

Authors:  Upali W Jayasinghe; Richard Taylor; John Boyages
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 9.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Sara L Jackson; Linn Abraham; Diana L Miglioretti; Patricia A Carney; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Edward A Sickles; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Opportunities for Operations Research in Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Sait Tunc; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  IEEE Intell Syst       Date:  2014 May-June       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Applying reinforcement learning techniques to detect hepatocellular carcinoma under limited screening capacity.

Authors:  Elliot Lee; Mariel S Lavieri; Michael L Volk; Yongcai Xu
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-10-12

3.  Diagnostic Policies Optimization for Chronic Diseases Based on POMDP Model.

Authors:  Wenqian Zhang; Haiyan Wang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  A new perspective on breast cancer diagnostic guidelines to reduce overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Sait Tunç; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Prod Oper Manag       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Risk-based breast cancer follow-up stratified by age.

Authors:  Annemieke Witteveen; Jan W M Otten; Ingrid M H Vliegen; Sabine Siesling; Judith B Timmer; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.