Literature DB >> 10760000

Patients' perceptions of physicians' recommendations for comfort care differ by patient age and gender.

M F Johnson1, M Lin, S Mangalik, D J Murphy, A M Kramer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine patient characteristics associated with patient and proxy perceptions of physicians' recommendations for life-prolonging care versus comfort care, and with acceptance of such recommendations.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
SETTING: Five teaching hospitals in Denver, Colo. PATIENTS: We studied 239 hospitalized adults believed by physicians to have a high likelihood of dying within 6 months.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Interviews with patients or proxies were conducted to determine perceptions of physicians' recommended goal of care and roles in decision making. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 66.6 years; 44% were women. In adjusted analysis, age greater than 70 years and female gender were associated with a higher likelihood of believing that comfort care had been recommended by the physician (odds ratio [OR], 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89 to 7.24; OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3. 84, respectively). Patients and proxies gave substantial decision-making authority to physicians: 29% responded that physicians dominate decision making, 55% that decision making is equally shared by physicians and patients, and only 16% that patients make decisions. Increasing age was associated with an increased likelihood of believing that physicians should dominate decision making (P <.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced illness, perceived comfort care recommendations were related to patient age and gender, raising concern about possible gender and age bias in physicians' recommendations. Although all patients and proxies gave significant decision-making authority to physicians, older individuals were more likely to give physicians decision-making authority, making them more vulnerable to possible physician bias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10760000      PMCID: PMC1495435          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.07004.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  46 in total

1.  The illusion of patient choice in end-of-life decisions.

Authors:  D Orentlicher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in elderly patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H M Krumholz; R C Pasternak; M C Weinstein; G C Friesinger; P M Ridker; A N Tosteson; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Computerised tomography and stroke.

Authors:  T P Cassidy; S Lewis; C S Gray
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 0.729

4.  Medical intensive care for the elderly. A study of current use, costs, and outcomes.

Authors:  E W Campion; A G Mulley; R L Goldstein; G O Barnett; G E Thibault
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The Mini-Mental State Examination.

Authors:  M F Folstein; L N Robins; J E Helzer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1983-07

6.  Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.

Authors:  M B Hamel; J M Teno; L Goldman; J Lynn; R B Davis; A N Galanos; N Desbiens; A F Connors; N Wenger; R S Phillips
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-01-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Variation in utilization of procedures for treatment of peripheral arterial disease. A look at patient characteristics.

Authors:  S R Tunis; E B Bass; M J Klag; E P Steinberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-26

8.  A community-wide perspective of gender differences and temporal trends in the use of diagnostic and revascularization procedures for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D E Chiriboga; J Yarzebski; R J Goldberg; Z Chen; J Gurwitz; J M Gore; J S Alpert; J E Dalen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Gender differences in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  L J Shaw; D D Miller; J C Romeis; D Kargl; L T Younis; B R Chaitman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Long-term outcome of critically ill elderly patients requiring intensive care.

Authors:  L Chelluri; M R Pinsky; M P Donahoe; A Grenvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Jun 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Male-female patient differences in the association between end-of-life discussions and receipt of intensive care near death.

Authors:  Rashmi K Sharma; Holly G Prigerson; Frank J Penedo; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Predictors of time to death after terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in the ICU.

Authors:  Colin R Cooke; David L Hotchkin; Ruth A Engelberg; Lewis Rubinson; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  The role of empirical research in bioethics.

Authors:  Alexander A Kon
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Nursing home residence confounds gender differences in Medicare utilization an example of Simpson's paradox.

Authors:  Andrea C Kronman; Karen M Freund; Amresh Hanchate; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Arlene S Ash
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010-02-10

5.  Are rheumatologists' treatment decisions influenced by patients' age?

Authors:  L Fraenkel; N Rabidou; R Dhar
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Cross-cultural similarities and differences in attitudes about advance care planning.

Authors:  Henry S Perkins; Cynthia M A Geppert; Adelita Gonzales; Josie D Cortez; Helen P Hazuda
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Review of evidence and explanations for suboptimal screening and treatment of dyslipidemia in women. A conceptual model.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; Timothy P Hofer; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Preferences for active and aggressive intervention among patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Maida; Jonathan Peck; Marguerite Ennis; Navjot Brar; Alexandria R Maida
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.