Literature DB >> 10758096

Neural responses to overlapping FM sounds in the inferior colliculus of echolocating bats.

M I Sanderson1, J A Simmons.   

Abstract

The big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, navigates and hunts prey with echolocation, a modality that uses the temporal and spectral differences between vocalizations and echoes from objects to build spatial images. Closely spaced surfaces ("glints") return overlapping echoes if two echoes return within the integration time of the cochlea ( approximately 300-400 micros). The overlap results in spectral interference that provides information about target structure or texture. Previous studies have shown that two acoustic events separated in time by less than approximately 500 micros evoke only a single response from neural elements in the auditory brain stem. How does the auditory system encode multiple echoes in time when only a single response is available? We presented paired FM stimuli with delay separations from 0 to 24 micros to big brown bats and recorded local field potentials (LFPs) and single-unit responses from the inferior colliculus (IC). These stimuli have one or two interference notches positioned in their spectrum as a function of two-glint separation. For the majority of single units, response counts decreased for two-glint separations when the resulting FM signal had a spectral notch positioned at the cell's best frequency (BF). The smallest two-glint separation that reliably evoked a decrease in spike count was 6 micros. In addition, first-spike latency increased for two-glint stimuli with notches positioned nearby BF. The N(4) potential of averaged LFPs showed a decrease in amplitude for two-glint separations that had a spectral notch near the BF of the recording site. Derived LFPs were computed by subtracting a common-mode signal from each LFP evoked by the two-glint FM stimuli. The derived LFP records show clear changes in both the amplitude and latency as a function of two-glint separation. These observations in relation with the single-unit data suggest that both response amplitude and latency can carry information about two-glint separation in the auditory system of E. fuscus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10758096     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.1840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

Review 1.  Complex echo classification by echo-locating bats: a review.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Matthias O Franz; Peter Stilz; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Bats and frogs and animals in between: evidence for a common central timing mechanism to extract periodicity pitch.

Authors:  James A Simmons; Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors differentially modulate rate and timing of auditory responses in the mouse inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Lissandra Castellan Baldan Ramsey; Shiva R Sinha; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Perception of echo delay is disrupted by small temporal misalignment of echo harmonics in bat sonar.

Authors:  Mary E Bates; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Echolocation of multiple targets in 3-d space from a single emission.

Authors:  M Yano; I Matsuo; J Tani
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.365

7.  Effects of filtering of harmonics from biosonar echoes on delay acuity by big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Authors:  Mary E Bates; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A comprehensive computational model of animal biosonar signal processing.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Stephanie Haro; Andrea Megela Simmons; James A Simmons
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Delay accuracy in bat sonar is related to the reciprocal of normalized echo bandwidth, or Q.

Authors:  James A Simmons; Nicola Neretti; Nathan Intrator; Richard A Altes; Michael J Ferragamo; Mark I Sanderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cortical neurons of bats respond best to echoes from nearest targets when listening to natural biosonar multi-echo streams.

Authors:  M Jerome Beetz; Julio C Hechavarría; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.