Literature DB >> 1987741

Perceptions of follow-up care in women with breast cancer.

H B Muss1, G S Tell, L D Case, P Robertson, B M Atwell.   

Abstract

One hundred one patients with breast cancer, 48 localized and 53 metastatic, were questioned about their perceptions of follow-up examinations. Patients with metastatic disease preferred more frequent follow-up. Most indicated that they wanted their physicians to ask them about pain and nutritional status at each follow-up visit and were aware of the tests they had received. Only a third of the patients recognized the value of the history in detecting recurrence, and two-thirds felt that the physical examination was helpful. Laboratory tests and imaging procedures were rated higher than the history in detecting recurrence. Most patients were unaware of the implications of a normal procedure or test and perceived "normal" as meaning an absence of cancer cells in the organ evaluated. Knowledge of the value and limitations of testing was not related to educational level or disease stage. Patients need to be educated about the effectiveness of follow-up examination. Greater emphasis should be placed on the history and physical examination, and the limitations of more costly laboratory and imaging procedures should be explained carefully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1987741     DOI: 10.1097/00000421-199102000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  8 in total

1.  Follow-up of epithelial ovarian cancer: overdue for a major rethink.

Authors:  Paul Hoskins
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors:  L K Temple; E E Wang; R S McLeod
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Reported Concerns and Acceptance of Information or Referrals Among Breast Cancer Survivors Seen for Care Planning Visits: Results from the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Survivorship Program.

Authors:  Leah Cha; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Elena M Smith; Thevaa Chandereng; Karol J Huenerberg; Lori A Seaborne; Cibele B Carroll; Mary E Sesto
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E Grunfeld; R Fitzpatrick; D Mant; P Yudkin; R Adewuyi-Dalton; J Stewart; D Cole; M Vessey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  A qualitative study of patient and clinician attitudes regarding surveillance after a resection of pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer.

Authors:  Raymond G Deobald; Eva S W Cheng; Yoo-Joung Ko; Frances C Wright; Paul J Karanicolas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  Survivorship navigation outcome measures: a report from the ACS patient navigation working group on survivorship navigation.

Authors:  Mandi Pratt-Chapman; Melissa A Simon; Angela K Patterson; Betsy C Risendal; Steven Patierno
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Cancer survivorship: challenges and changing paradigms.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; David C Miller; Brent K Hollenbeck; James E Montie; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Patient's needs and preferences in routine follow-up after treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  G H de Bock; J Bonnema; R E Zwaan; C J H van de Velde; J Kievit; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.