R van Doorn1, J W Stapert. 1. Department of Surgery, Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of stabilising impending and actual pathological femoral fractures using the long Gamma nail with the published results of other methods. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: 20 hospitals throughout The Netherlands. PATIENTS: 101 patients with metastases in 110 femurs, which were stabilised with a long Gamma nail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional results and complications. RESULTS: Minimum follow-up was 1.5 years or until death, Mean survival was 12 months (range 0-82). 14 patients died in hospital; 5 had technical complications and fat embolism was suspected in 3 patients. 92% of the patients became mobile and pain was absent or acceptable in 93%. CONCLUSION: The use of the long Gamma nail produces better functional results, fewer technical complications, and an incidence of general complications no different from those reported for other methods.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of stabilising impending and actual pathological femoral fractures using the long Gamma nail with the published results of other methods. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: 20 hospitals throughout The Netherlands. PATIENTS: 101 patients with metastases in 110 femurs, which were stabilised with a long Gamma nail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional results and complications. RESULTS: Minimum follow-up was 1.5 years or until death, Mean survival was 12 months (range 0-82). 14 patients died in hospital; 5 had technical complications and fat embolism was suspected in 3 patients. 92% of the patients became mobile and pain was absent or acceptable in 93%. CONCLUSION: The use of the long Gamma nail produces better functional results, fewer technical complications, and an incidence of general complications no different from those reported for other methods.
Authors: Julie J Willeumier; Mustafa Kaynak; Peer van der Zwaal; Sven A G Meylaerts; Nina M C Mathijssen; Paul C Jutte; Panagiotis Tsagozis; Rikard Wedin; Michiel A J van de Sande; Marta Fiocco; P D Sander Dijkstra Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Max Zacherl; Gerald Gruber; Mathias Glehr; Petra Ofner-Kopeinig; Roman Radl; Manfred Greitbauer; Vilmos Vecsei; Reinhard Windhager Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Norah Harvey; Elke R Ahlmann; Daniel C Allison; Lingjun Wang; Lawrence R Menendez Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Costantino Errani; Monica Cosentino; Giovanni Ciani; Lorenzo Ferra; Patricio A Alfaro; Barbara Bordini; Davide M Donati Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Bill Ristevski; Richard J Jenkinson; David J G Stephen; Joel Finkelstein; Emil H Schemitsch; Michael D McKee; Hans J Kreder Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.089