Costantino Errani1, Monica Cosentino2, Giovanni Ciani3, Lorenzo Ferra3, Patricio A Alfaro4, Barbara Bordini2, Davide M Donati3. 1. Orthopaedic Service, Musculoskeletal Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, via Pupilli n1, 40136, Bologna, Italy. costantino.errani@ior.it. 2. Medical Technology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. 3. Orthopaedic Service, Musculoskeletal Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, via Pupilli n1, 40136, Bologna, Italy. 4. Hospital Traumatologico de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgical options for long bone metastases include intramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. Patients with a short life expectancy may benefit from less invasive surgery such as intramedullary nail fixation, while patients with a long life expectancy could be treated with more invasive surgery such as prosthetic reconstruction. The purpose of our study was to analyze the survival of patients treated surgically for long bone metastases, determining the prognostic factors affecting survival and analyzing the surgical complications and reoperation rates. Based on our results, we developed a prognostic score that helps to choose the best treatment for these patients. In addition, we compared the performance of our prognostic score with other previous prognostic models. METHOD: We investigated prospectively potential clinical and laboratory prognostic factors in 159 patients with metastatic bone disease who underwent surgery with intramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical data were collected, recording the following data: age and sex of patients, primary tumour and time of diagnosis, number (single or multiple) and presentation (synchronous or metachronous) of bone metastases, presence of visceral metastases. The following laboratory data were analyzed: hemoglobin, leukocyte counts, lymphocyte counts, platelets count, alkaline phosphatase, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Our study showed that pathological C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis were significant negative independent prognostic factors at 12-month survival. Based on our results, we created a score using C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis, creating three different prognostic groups: (A) good prognosis primary tumour and physiological CRP with probability of survival at 12 months of 88.9 [80.1-98.5]; (B) bad prognosis primary tumour and physiological CRP or good prognosis primary tumour and pathological CRP with a probability of survival at 12 months of 56.7 [45.4-70.7]; (C) bad prognosis primary tumour and pathological CRP with a probability of survival at 12 months of 12.5 [5.0-28.3]. Using ROC multiple analysis, our score (AUC = 0.816) was the most accurate in predicting a 12-month survival compared to previous prognostic models. DISCUSSION: Patients treated surgically for long bone metastases with a life expectancy over 12 months should be treated with more durable reconstruction, while patients with a life expectancy less than 12 months should be treated with less invasive surgery. The diagnosis of primary cancer and C-reactive protein are two very simple data which every orthopaedic surgeon in any community hospital can easily rely on for any decision-making in the surgical treatment of a complex patient as with a patient with skeletal metastases. CONCLUSION: Our prognostic score based on only two simple variables (C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis) was able to predict the 12-month survival of patients treated surgically for long bone metastases and could be helpful in choosing the best treatment for these patients.
PURPOSE: Surgical options for long bone metastases include intramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. Patients with a short life expectancy may benefit from less invasive surgery such as intramedullary nail fixation, while patients with a long life expectancy could be treated with more invasive surgery such as prosthetic reconstruction. The purpose of our study was to analyze the survival of patients treated surgically for long bone metastases, determining the prognostic factors affecting survival and analyzing the surgical complications and reoperation rates. Based on our results, we developed a prognostic score that helps to choose the best treatment for these patients. In addition, we compared the performance of our prognostic score with other previous prognostic models. METHOD: We investigated prospectively potential clinical and laboratory prognostic factors in 159 patients with metastatic bone disease who underwent surgery with intramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical data were collected, recording the following data: age and sex of patients, primary tumour and time of diagnosis, number (single or multiple) and presentation (synchronous or metachronous) of bone metastases, presence of visceral metastases. The following laboratory data were analyzed: hemoglobin, leukocyte counts, lymphocyte counts, platelets count, alkaline phosphatase, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Our study showed that pathological C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis were significant negative independent prognostic factors at 12-month survival. Based on our results, we created a score using C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis, creating three different prognostic groups: (A) good prognosis primary tumour and physiological CRP with probability of survival at 12 months of 88.9 [80.1-98.5]; (B) bad prognosis primary tumour and physiological CRP or good prognosis primary tumour and pathological CRP with a probability of survival at 12 months of 56.7 [45.4-70.7]; (C) bad prognosis primary tumour and pathological CRP with a probability of survival at 12 months of 12.5 [5.0-28.3]. Using ROC multiple analysis, our score (AUC = 0.816) was the most accurate in predicting a 12-month survival compared to previous prognostic models. DISCUSSION: Patients treated surgically for long bone metastases with a life expectancy over 12 months should be treated with more durable reconstruction, while patients with a life expectancy less than 12 months should be treated with less invasive surgery. The diagnosis of primary cancer and C-reactive protein are two very simple data which every orthopaedic surgeon in any community hospital can easily rely on for any decision-making in the surgical treatment of a complex patient as with a patient with skeletal metastases. CONCLUSION: Our prognostic score based on only two simple variables (C-reactive protein and primary tumour diagnosis) was able to predict the 12-month survival of patients treated surgically for long bone metastases and could be helpful in choosing the best treatment for these patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
C-reactive protein; Impending fracture; Intramedullary nail fixation; Long bone metastases; Metastatic bone disease; Metastatic cancer; Pathologic fracture; Prognostic factors; Prognostic score; Prosthetic reconstruction; Skeletal metastases; Surgery; Treatment
Authors: J J Willeumier; Y M van der Linden; C W P G van der Wal; P C Jutte; J M van der Velden; M A Smolle; P van der Zwaal; P Koper; L Bakri; I de Pree; A Leithner; M Fiocco; P D S Dijkstra Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Norah Harvey; Elke R Ahlmann; Daniel C Allison; Lingjun Wang; Lawrence R Menendez Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Joannis Panotopoulos; Florian Posch; Benjamin Alici; Philipp Funovics; Christoph Stihsen; Gabriele Amann; Thomas Brodowicz; Reinhard Windhager; Cihan Ay Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Maire Ratasvuori; Rikard Wedin; Johnny Keller; Markus Nottrott; Olga Zaikova; Peter Bergh; Anders Kalen; Johan Nilsson; Halldor Jonsson; Minna Laitinen Journal: Surg Oncol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Jonathan Agner Forsberg; John Eberhardt; Patrick J Boland; Rikard Wedin; John H Healey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dirk Rades; Jon Cacicedo; Darejan Lomidze; Ahmed Al-Salool; Barbara Segedin; Blaz Groselj; Steven E Schild Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-22 Impact factor: 6.575