Literature DB >> 10750130

Far-field QRS complex sensing: prevalence and timing with bipolar atrial leads.

J Brandt1, W Worzewski.   

Abstract

Sensing of far-field QRS complex through the atrial pacemaker lead may cause a number of pacemaker function disturbances, most of which are rarely seen with modern pulse generators. However, certain pulse generator algorithms will still be jeopardized by far-field QRS complex sensing. Intracardiac electrograms with markers were obtained by telemetry in 30 patients following implantation of a permanent bipolar atrial lead and a DDDR pulse generator. The occurrence and timing of far-field QRS complex sensing was studied at different atrial amplifier sensitivity settings. With paced ventricular complexes, QRS sensing was documented in all 30 cases at the maximum atrial sensitivity (0.1 mV). The median QRS complex sensing threshold was 0.3 mV, and the sensing window at high atrial sensitivities was 67-202 ms following the ventricular pacing impulse. In one case, QRS complex sensing was seen up to an atrial sensitivity of 1.5 mV. In 12 of 13 patients with 1:1 AV conduction, atrial sensing of spontaneously conducted ventricular complexes was seen (median sensing threshold 0.2 mV; the sensing window was -23 to 114 ms relative to the ventricular amplifier sensing event). Far-field QRS complex sensing was also found in all 12 patients in whom ventricular fusion complexes were obtained (median sensing threshold 0.2 mV; the window of sensing was 64-187 ms after the ventricular pacing impulse). Constant or intermittent QRS complex sensing via the atrial bipolar lead was thus universally demonstrable. It occurred in only a minority (20%) of patients at a sensitivity of 0.5 mV or less. Knowledge regarding the timing of the oversensing as related to the atrial sensitivity setting may aid in the design of algorithms of future pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10750130     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb06755.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

Review 1.  A reappraisal of pacemaker timing cycles pertaining to automatic mode switching.

Authors:  R X Stroobandt; S S Barold; F D Vandenbulcke; R J Willems; A F Sinnaeve
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Atrial near-field and ventricular far-field analysis by automated signal processing at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Frank Eberhardt; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Martin Lipphardt; Ulrich G Hofmann; Heribert Schunkert; Uwe K H Wiegand
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Digital technology in cardiac pacing: methods for morphology analysis of sensed endocavitary signals.

Authors:  Luigi Padeletti; Antonio Michelucci; Gerd Fröhlig; Giorgio Corbucci; Geeske van Oort; Serge S Barold
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Preventricular far-field sensing in the atrial channel of dual chamber pacemakers--an occasional cause of inappropriate mode switch.

Authors:  Christof Kolb; Selim Aratma; Bernhard Zrenner; Claus Schmitt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Far field R-wave sensing in Myotonic Dystrophy type 1: right atrial appendage versus Bachmann's bundle region lead placement.

Authors:  Vincenzo Russo; Gerardo Nigro; Andrea Antonio Papa; Anna Rago; Federica Di Meo; Anna Cristiano; Antonio Molino; Raffaele Calabrò; Maria Giovanna Russo; Luisa Politano
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2014-10

6.  Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers - do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?

Authors:  Michal Chudzik; Artur Klimczak; Jerzy Krzysztof Wranicz
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.