Literature DB >> 10748933

Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative.

C H Liu1, C A Collin, A M Burton, A Chaudhuri.   

Abstract

Face recognition in photographic positive and negative was examined in a same/different matching task in five lighting direction conditions using untextured 3-D laser-scanned faces. The lighting directions were +60, +30, 0, -30 and -60 degrees, where negative values represent bottom lighting and positive values represent top lighting. Recognition performance was better for faces in positive than in negative when lighting directions were at +60 degrees. In one experiment, the same effect was also found at +30 degrees. However, faces in negative were recognized better than positive when the direction was -60 degrees. There was no difference in recognition performance when the lighting direction was 0 and -30 degrees. These results confirm that the effect of lighting direction can be a determinant of the photographic negative effect. Positive faces, which normally appear to be top-lit, may be difficult to recognize in negative partly because of the accompanying change in apparent lighting direction to bottom-lit.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10748933     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00109-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  What makes faces special?

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding.

Authors:  Sharon Gilad; Ming Meng; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Face dissimilarity judgments are predicted by representational distance in morphable and image-computable models.

Authors:  Kamila M Jozwik; Jonathan O'Keeffe; Katherine R Storrs; Wenxuan Guo; Tal Golan; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  fMRI analysis of contrast polarity in face-selective cortex in humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Shahin Nasr; Kathryn J Devaney; Daphne J Holt; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Effects of exposure to facial expression variation in face learning and recognition.

Authors:  Chang Hong Liu; Wenfeng Chen; James Ward
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-15

6.  About Face: Matching Unfamiliar Faces Across Rotations of View and Lighting.

Authors:  Simone Favelle; Harold Hill; Peter Claes
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-29

7.  Perception without preconception: comparison between the human and machine learner in recognition of tissues from histological sections.

Authors:  Sanghita Barui; Parikshit Sanyal; K S Rajmohan; Ajay Malik; Sharmila Dudani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Natural Contrast Statistics Facilitate Human Face Categorization.

Authors:  Joan Liu-Shuang; Yu-Fang Yang; Bruno Rossion; Valérie Goffaux
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-10-06

9.  Depth structure from asymmetric shading supports face discrimination.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen; Chin-Mei Chen; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.