Literature DB >> 23518007

fMRI analysis of contrast polarity in face-selective cortex in humans and monkeys.

Xiaomin Yue1, Shahin Nasr, Kathryn J Devaney, Daphne J Holt, Roger B H Tootell.   

Abstract

Recognition is strongly impaired when the normal contrast polarity of faces is reversed. For instance, otherwise-familiar faces become very difficult to recognize when viewed as photographic negatives. Here, we used fMRI to demonstrate related properties in visual cortex: 1) fMRI responses in the human Fusiform Face Area (FFA) decreased strongly (26%) to contrast-reversed faces across a wide range of contrast levels (5.3-100% RMS contrast), in all subjects tested. In a whole brain analysis, this contrast polarity bias was largely confined to the Fusiform Face Area (FFA; p<0.0001), with possible involvement of a left occipital face-selective region. 2) It is known that reversing facial contrast affects three image properties in parallel (absorbance, shading, and specular reflection). Here, comparison of FFA responses to those in V1 suggests that the contrast polarity bias is produced in FFA only when all three component properties were reversed simultaneously, which suggests a prominent non-linearity in FFA processing. 3) Across a wide range (180°) of illumination source angles, 3D face shapes without texture produced response constancy in FFA, without a contrast polarity bias. 4) Consistent with psychophysics, analogous fMRI biases for normal contrast polarity were not produced by non-face objects, with image statistics similar to the face stimuli. 5) Using fMRI, we also demonstrated a contrast polarity bias in awake behaving macaque monkeys, in the cortical region considered homologous to human FFA. Thus common cortical mechanisms may underlie facial contrast processing across ~25 million years of primate evolution.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23518007      PMCID: PMC3647014          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  78 in total

1.  Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: a comparison.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; J Stephen Higgins; Whitney Parker; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Samantha Cooperman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation.

Authors:  Richard Russell; Pawan Sinha; Irving Biederman; Marissa Nederhouser
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Developmental differences in the neural bases of the face inversion effect show progressive tuning of face-selective regions to the upright orientation.

Authors:  A M Passarotti; J Smith; M DeLano; J Huang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells.

Authors:  Doris Y Tsao; Winrich A Freiwald; Roger B H Tootell; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  What makes faces special?

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Contrast invariance in the human lateral occipital complex depends on attention.

Authors:  Scott O Murray; Sheng He
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects.

Authors:  Marissa Nederhouser; Xiaomin Yue; Michael C Mangini; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Spatial attention and the latency of neuronal responses in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Joonyeol Lee; Tori Williford; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory.

Authors:  Golijeh Golarai; Dara G Ghahremani; S Whitfield-Gabrieli; Allan Reiss; Jennifer L Eberhardt; John D E Gabrieli; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

1.  Thinking outside the box: rectilinear shapes selectively activate scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Cesar E Echavarria; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Natural Contrast Statistics Facilitate Human Face Categorization.

Authors:  Joan Liu-Shuang; Yu-Fang Yang; Bruno Rossion; Valérie Goffaux
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-10-06

3.  A parametric study of fear generalization to faces and non-face objects: relationship to discrimination thresholds.

Authors:  Daphne J Holt; Emily A Boeke; Rick P F Wolthusen; Shahin Nasr; Mohammed R Milad; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Columnar Segregation of Magnocellular and Parvocellular Streams in Human Extrastriate Cortex.

Authors:  Roger B H Tootell; Shahin Nasr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Functional ultrasound imaging of deep visual cortex in awake nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Kévin Blaize; Fabrice Arcizet; Marc Gesnik; Harry Ahnine; Ulisse Ferrari; Thomas Deffieux; Pierre Pouget; Frédéric Chavane; Mathias Fink; José-Alain Sahel; Mickael Tanter; Serge Picaud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.