Literature DB >> 10746838

Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in fetal weight and volume estimation in diabetic and normal pregnancy.

J Uotila1, P Dastidar, T Heinonen, P Ryymin, R Punnonen, E Laasonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate fetal volume and weight in diabetic and normal pregnancy using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was combined with semiautomatic segmentation technique. The accuracy of fetal volume estimations thus obtained was compared with conventional ultrasound-based weight estimations in ten pregnant women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and ten women with normal pregnancy. Examinations were made within 48 hours before delivery.
RESULTS: Ultrasound-based estimations of fetal weight showed a correlation rate of r=0.77 with the actual birth weights in the whole material, while volume determinations based on magnetic resonance imaging showed a significantly better correlation rate of r=0.95. Diabetic women did not differ from the normal pregnancy group with regard to birth weight or the accuracy of weight estimations.
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging combined with semiautomatic segmentation software was found to be accurate in determining fetal volume and, consequently, better than conventional ultrasound-based techniques in estimating fetal weight. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in fetal weight estimation may be recommended for clinical situations where an accurate weight estimate is considered essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10746838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  8 in total

Review 1.  Body composition during fetal development and infancy through the age of 5 years.

Authors:  T Toro-Ramos; C Paley; F X Pi-Sunyer; D Gallagher
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  A comparison of ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of fetal biometry and weight in the second trimester of pregnancy: An observer agreement and variability study.

Authors:  Jacqueline Matthew; Christina Malamateniou; Caroline L Knight; Kelly P Baruteau; Tara Fletcher; Alice Davidson; Laura McCabe; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Mary Rutherford
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-01-29

3.  Management of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Annunziata Lapolla; Maria Grazia Dalfrà; Domenico Fedele
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  Determination of Accuracy of Fetal Weight Using Ultrasound and Clinical Fetal Weight Estimations in Calabar South, South Nigeria.

Authors:  Charles Njoku; Cajethan Emechebe; Patience Odusolu; Sylvestre Abeshi; Chinedu Chukwu; John Ekabua
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-11-10

5.  Protocol for the prospective observational clinical study: estimation of fetal weight by MRI to PREdict neonatal MACROsomia (PREMACRO study) and small-for-gestational age neonates.

Authors:  Caroline Kadji; Mieke M Cannie; Andrew Carlin; Jacques C Jani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Measuring intrauterine growth in healthy pregnancies using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ariunzaya Amgalan; Kushal Kapse; Dhineshvikram Krishnamurthy; Nicole R Andersen; Rima Izem; Ahmet Baschat; Jessica Quistorff; Alexis C Gimovsky; Homa K Ahmadzia; Catherine Limperopoulos; Nickie N Andescavage
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Regimens of fetal surveillance of suspected large-for-gestational-age fetuses for improving health outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine A T Culliney; Graham K Parry; Julie Brown; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-05

8.  Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Akinola S Shittu; Oluwafemi Kuti; Ernest O Orji; Niyi O Makinde; Solomon O Ogunniy; Oluwagbemiga O Ayoola; Salami S Sule
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.