Literature DB >> 10746445

Assessment of the reliability of human corneal endothelial cell-density estimates using a noncontact specular microscope.

M J Doughty1, A Müller, M L Zaman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the variance in endothelial cell density (ECD) estimates for human corneal endothelia.
METHODS: Noncontact specular micrographs were obtained from white subjects without any history of contact lens wear, or major eye disease or surgery; subjects were within four age groups (children, young adults, older adults, senior citizens). The endothelial image was scanned, and the areas from > or =75 cells measured from an overlay by planimetry. The cell-area values were used to calculate the ECD repeatedly so that the intra- and intersubject variation in an average ECD estimate could be made by using different numbers of cells (5, 10, 15, etc.).
RESULTS: An average ECD of 3,519 cells/mm2 (range, 2,598-5,312 cells/mm2) was obtained of counts of 75 cells/ endothelium from individuals aged 6-83 years. Average ECD estimates in each age group were 4,124, 3,457, 3,360, and 3,113 cells/mm2, respectively. Analysis of intersubject variance revealed that ECD estimates would be expected to be no better than +/-10% if only 25 cells were measured per endothelium, but approach +/-2% if 75 cells are measured.
CONCLUSION: In assessing the corneal endothelium by noncontact specular microscopy, cell count should be given, and this should be > or =75/ endothelium for an expected variance to be at a level close to that recommended for monitoring age-, stress-, or surgery-related changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10746445     DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200003000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  22 in total

1.  Is manual counting of corneal endothelial cell density in eye banks still acceptable? The French experience.

Authors:  G Thuret; C Manissolle; S Acquart; J-C Le Petit; J Maugery; L Campos-Guyotat; M J Doughty; P Gain
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Corneal endothelial cell analysis using two non-contact specular microscopes in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Manuel Garza-Leon
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Assessment of the human corneal endothelium: in vivo Topcon SP2000P specular microscope versus ex vivo sambacornea eye bank analyser.

Authors:  G Thuret; N Deb-Joardar; C Manissolle; Min Zhao; M Peoch; P Gain; Y Gavet
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions.

Authors:  Bernard E McCarey; Henry F Edelhauser; Michael J Lynn
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S Jonuscheit; M J Doughty; K Ramaesh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Assessment of the reliability of endothelial cell-density estimates in the presence of pseudoguttata.

Authors:  Michael J Doughty; Sven Jonuscheit; Norman F Button
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Reassessment of the corneal endothelial cell organisation in children.

Authors:  A Müller; M J Doughty; L Wright
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.

Authors:  Sachiko Maruoka; Shunsuke Nakakura; Naoko Matsuo; Kayo Yoshitomi; Chikako Katakami; Hitoshi Tabuchi; Taiichiro Chikama; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Corneal endothelial morphology and function after torsional and longitudinal ultrasound mode phacoemulsification.

Authors:  László Jr Módis; Eszter Szalai; Zsuzsa Flaskó; Gábor Németh
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Specular microscopy ancillary study methods for donor endothelial cell density determination of Cornea Donor Study images.

Authors:  Beth Ann Benetz; Robin L Gal; Katrina J Ruedy; Carmella Rice; Roy W Beck; Andrea D Kalajian; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.