Literature DB >> 21912904

Assessment of the reliability of endothelial cell-density estimates in the presence of pseudoguttata.

Michael J Doughty1, Sven Jonuscheit, Norman F Button.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to assess the reliability of endothelial cell-density (ECD) estimates in corneas with different severity pseudoguttata.
METHODS: Specular microscopy was undertaken on grade 1, 2, or 3 pseudoguttata patients and age-matched controls aged 52-83 years. On high magnification prints of central cornea, areas of complete cells (all sides visible) and partial 'cells' (one or more sides obscured) were measured manually. Sets of 45 complete cells were selected, as well as 75 cells that were a mixture of complete and partial cells on guttate endothelia. ECD was calculated by a progressive averaging technique.
RESULTS: Each group comprised 12 patients with similar range of ECD values (1,230-4,587 cells/mm(2)). Based on 40 complete cells, ECD could be estimated to within ±3.1% for grade 3 pseudoguttata versus ±2.0% for controls. If a mixture of complete and partial cells were measured, ECD could be estimated to within ±2.8% for grade 3 pseudoguttata images (n = 70 cells) and ±1.1% for controls. The estimated variability increases to substantial levels of ±20% if only ten cells were measured. No statistical differences in ECD were noted between guttate and normal endothelia if only complete cells were measured, but could be different if partial 'cells' were included.
CONCLUSIONS: Providing adequate numbers of complete cells are measured and in the absence of obvious polymegathism, ECD estimates can be made to within around ±3% in the presence of typical but significant pseudoguttata.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21912904     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1812-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  32 in total

1.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S Jonuscheit; M J Doughty; K Ramaesh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  [Clinical experience with corneal endothelial microscopy. Comparison of normal and pathological findings].

Authors:  L Krejcí; P Rezek
Journal:  Cesk Oftalmol       Date:  1983-11

3.  [Effects of anterior segment inflammation on the corneal endothelium. Morphometric study with panoramic photography and cell shape analysis].

Authors:  A Okubo; S Inoda; K Ohara
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1983

4.  Standard microlithographic mosaics to assess endothelial cell counting methods by light microscopy in eye banks using organ culture.

Authors:  Nilanjana Deb-Joardar; Gilles Thuret; Georges-André Racine; David Pons; Gerald Brun; Olivier Parriaux; Michel Peoc'h; Sophie Acquart; Philippe Gain
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A comparison of corneal endothelial morphology in cornea guttata, Fuchs' dystrophy and bullous keratopathy.

Authors:  A M Brooks; G Grant; W E Gillies
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-05

6.  Endothelial cells in dominant cornea guttata.

Authors:  A Vannas; K Setälä; E Järvinen
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1980

7.  A specular microscopic study of families with endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  J I Schnitzer; J H Krachmer
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  [Morphologic characteristics of cornea in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy observed by confocal microscopy].

Authors:  Wei-Li Dong; Liu-He Zou; Zhi-Qiang Pan; Li Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2004-07

9.  Corneal specular microscopy in infectious and noninfectious uveitis.

Authors:  Filipe de Oliveira; Ana Carolina de Oliveira Motta; Cristina Muccioli
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.872

10.  Morphometry of corneal endothelium in patients with corneal guttata.

Authors:  Claude J Giasson; Leon D Solomon; Kenneth A Polse
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of a variable frame (polygonal) method to estimate corneal endothelial cell counts after corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S Jonuscheit; M J Doughty; K Ramaesh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.

Authors:  Jianyan Huang; Jyotsna Maram; Tudor C Tepelus; Cristina Modak; Ken Marion; SriniVas R Sadda; Vikas Chopra; Olivia L Lee
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-08-07

3.  Automated segmentation of the corneal endothelium in a large set of 'real-world' specular microscopy images using the U-Net architecture.

Authors:  Moritz C Daniel; Lisa Atzrodt; Felicitas Bucher; Katrin Wacker; Stefan Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard; Daniel Böhringer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Harry Y Liu; Uma Vaidyanathan; Anisha N Somani; Grant C Hopping; James R Barnes; Madeline B Heiland; David B Rosen; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.