Literature DB >> 10745046

Parental origin and mechanisms of formation of cytogenetically recognisable de novo direct and inverted duplications.

D Kotzot1, M J Martinez, G Bagci, S Basaran, A Baumer, F Binkert, L Brecevic, C Castellan, K Chrzanowska, F Dutly, A Gutkowska, S B Karaüzüm, M Krajewska-Walasek, G Luleci, P Miny, M Riegel, S Schuffenhauer, H Seidel, A Schinzel.   

Abstract

Cytogenetic, FISH, and molecular results of 20 cases with de novo tandem duplications of 18 different autosomal chromosome segments are reported. There were 12 cases with direct duplications, three cases with inverted duplications, and five in whom determination of direction was not possible. In seven cases a rearrangement between non-sister chromatids (N-SCR) was found, whereas in the remaining 13 cases sister chromatids (SCR) were involved. Paternal and maternal origin (7:7) was found almost equally in cases with SCR (3:4) and N-SCR (4:3). In the cases with proven inversion, there was maternal and paternal origin in one case each. Twenty three out of 43 cytogenetically determined breakpoints correlated with common or rare fragile sites. In five cases, including all those with proven inverse orientation, all breakpoints corresponded to common or rare fragile sites. In at least two cases, one with an interstitial duplication (dup(19)(q11q13)) and one with a terminal duplication (dup(8) (p10p23)), concomitant deletions (del(8) (p23p23.3) and del(19)(q13q13)) were found.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10745046      PMCID: PMC1734569          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.37.4.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  13 in total

1.  Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of a de novo tandem duplication of chromosome 21.

Authors:  J L Blouin; A Aurias; N Créau-Goldberg; F Apiou; C Alcaide-Loridan; A Bruel; M Prieur; J Kraus; J M Delabar; P M Sinet
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  The enigma of common fragile sites.

Authors:  I Simonic; G S Gericke
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  The same molecular mechanism at the maternal meiosis I produces mono- and dicentric 8p duplications.

Authors:  G Floridia; M Piantanida; A Minelli; C Dellavecchia; C Bonaglia; E Rossi; G Gimelli; G Croci; F Franchi; S Gilgenkrantz; P Grammatico; L Dalprá; S Wood; C Danesino; O Zuffardi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Prenatal detection and molecular characterization of a de novo duplication of the distal long arm of chromosome 19.

Authors:  P D Cotter; L D McCurdy; I F Gershin; A Babu; J P Willner; R J Desnick
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-08-22

Review 5.  Paternal duplication of chromosome 5q11.2-5q14 in a male born with craniostenosis, ear tags, kidney dysplasia and several other anomalies.

Authors:  E J Breslau-Siderius; J T Wijnen; J G Dauwerse; J M de Pater; F A Beemer; P M Khan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Simultaneous de novo interstitial deletion of 16q21 and intercalary duplication of 19q in a retarded infant with minor dysmorphic features.

Authors:  U Trautmann; R A Pfeiffer; U Seufert-Satomi; H U Tietze
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  A complete set of human telomeric probes and their clinical application. National Institutes of Health and Institute of Molecular Medicine collaboration.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus in a child with invdup(6)(q22q23) of paternal origin.

Authors:  E I Arthur; J Zlotogora; I Lerer; J Dagan; K Marks; D Abeliovich
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Syndromal obesity due to paternal duplication 6(q24.3-q27).

Authors:  A Smith; A Jauch; H Slater; L Robson; T Sandanam
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-05-21

10.  High level of unequal meiotic crossovers at the origin of the 22q11. 2 and 7q11.23 deletions.

Authors:  A Baumer; F Dutly; D Balmer; M Riegel; T Tükel; M Krajewska-Walasek; A A Schinzel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer.

Authors:  Efrat Ozeri-Galai; Michal Tur-Sinai; Assaf C Bester; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  De Novo Subtelomeric 6p25.3 Deletion with Duplication of 6q23.3-q27: Genotype-Phenotype Correlation.

Authors:  Emine Ikbal Atli; Hakan Gurkan; Engin Atli; Ulfet Vatansever; Betul Acunas; Cisem Mail
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2019-08-12

3.  Meiotic errors followed by two parallel postzygotic trisomy rescue events are a frequent cause of constitutional segmental mosaicism.

Authors:  Caroline Robberecht; Thierry Voet; Gülen E Utine; Albert Schinzel; Nicole de Leeuw; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Joris Vermeesch
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Pure interstitial dup(6)(q22.31q22.31) - a case report.

Authors:  Frenny Sheth; Sunil Trivedi; Joris Andrieux; Jean-Louis Blouin; Jayesh Sheth
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.638

5.  Infection with retroviral vectors leads to perturbed DNA replication increasing vector integrations into fragile sites.

Authors:  Assaf C Bester; Moshe Kafri; Karin Maoz; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A novel de novo duplication mutation of PAX6 in a Chinese family with aniridia and other ocular abnormalities.

Authors:  Jianfu Zhuang; Xiaole Chen; Zhihua Tan; Yihua Zhu; Kanxing Zhao; Juhua Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High chromosomal instability in workers occupationally exposed to solvents and paint removers.

Authors:  Mónica Villalba-Campos; Lilian Chuaire-Noack; Magda Carolina Sánchez-Corredor; Milena Rondón-Lagos
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Molecular cytogenetic characterisation of a mosaic add(12)(p13.3) with an inv dup(3)(q26.31 --> qter) detected in an autistic boy.

Authors:  Isabel M Carreira; Joana B Melo; Carlos Rodrigues; Liesbeth Backx; Joris Vermeesch; Anja Weise; Nadezda Kosyakova; Guiomar Oliveira; Eunice Matoso
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Two mosaic terminal inverted duplications arising post-zygotically: Evidence for possible formation of neo-telomeres.

Authors:  Art Daniel; Luke St Heaps; Dianne Sylvester; Sara Diaz; Gregory Peters
Journal:  Cell Chromosome       Date:  2008-03-10

10.  Large inverted duplications in the human genome form via a fold-back mechanism.

Authors:  Karen E Hermetz; Scott Newman; Karen N Conneely; Christa L Martin; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Jannine D Cody; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.