Literature DB >> 9536094

High level of unequal meiotic crossovers at the origin of the 22q11. 2 and 7q11.23 deletions.

A Baumer1, F Dutly, D Balmer, M Riegel, T Tükel, M Krajewska-Walasek, A A Schinzel.   

Abstract

Interstitial chromosomal deletions at 22q11.2 and 7q11.23 are detected in the vast majority of patients affected by CATCH 22 syndromes and the Williams-Beuren syndrome, respectively. In a group of 15 Williams-Beuren patients, we have shown previously that a large number of 7q11.23 deletions occur in association with an interchromosomal rearrangement, indicative of an unequal crossing-over event between the two homologous chromosomes 7. In this study, we show that a similar mechanism also underlies the formation of the 22q11.2 deletions associated with CATCH 22. In eight out of 10 families with a proband affected by CATCH 22, we were able to show that a meiotic recombination had occurred at the critical deleted region based on segregation analysis of grandparental haplotypes. The incidences of crossovers observed between the closest informative markers, proximal and distal to the deletion, were compared with the expected recombination frequencies between the markers. A significant number of recombination events occur at the breakpoint of deletions in CATCH 22 patients (P = 2.99x10(-7)). The segregation analysis of haplotypes in three-generation families was also performed on an extended number of Williams-Beuren cases (22 cases in all). The statistically significant occurrence of meiotic crossovers (P = 4.45x10(-9)) further supports the previous findings. Thus, unequal meiotic crossover events appear to play a relevant role in the formation of the two interstitial deletions. The recurrence risk for healthy parents in cases where such meiotic recombinations can be demonstrated is probably negligible. Such a finding is in agreement with the predominantly sporadic occurrence of the 22q11.2 and 7q11. 23 deletions. No parent-of-origin bias was observed in the two groups of patients with regard to the origin of the deletion and to the occurrence of inter- versus intrachromosomal rearrangements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9536094     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/7.5.887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  49 in total

1.  Parental origin and mechanisms of formation of cytogenetically recognisable de novo direct and inverted duplications.

Authors:  D Kotzot; M J Martinez; G Bagci; S Basaran; A Baumer; F Binkert; L Brecevic; C Castellan; K Chrzanowska; F Dutly; A Gutkowska; S B Karaüzüm; M Krajewska-Walasek; G Luleci; P Miny; M Riegel; S Schuffenhauer; H Seidel; A Schinzel
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Generation and comparative analysis of approximately 3.3 Mb of mouse genomic sequence orthologous to the region of human chromosome 7q11.23 implicated in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Udaya DeSilva; Laura Elnitski; Jacquelyn R Idol; Johannah L Doyle; Weiniu Gan; James W Thomas; Scott Schwartz; Nicole L Dietrich; Stephen M Beckstrom-Sternberg; Jennifer C McDowell; Robert W Blakesley; Gerard G Bouffard; Pamela J Thomas; Jeffrey W Touchman; Webb Miller; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A 1.5 million-base pair inversion polymorphism in families with Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Authors:  L R Osborne; M Li; B Pober; D Chitayat; J Bodurtha; A Mandel; T Costa; T Grebe; S Cox; L C Tsui; S W Scherer
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Genetic proof of unequal meiotic crossovers in reciprocal deletion and duplication of 17p11.2.

Authors:  Christine J Shaw; Weimin Bi; James R Lupski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  AT-rich palindromes mediate the constitutional t(11;22) translocation.

Authors:  L Edelmann; E Spiteri; K Koren; V Pulijaal; M G Bialer; A Shanske; R Goldberg; B E Morrow
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Is the rate of insertion and deletion mutation male biased?: Molecular evolutionary analysis of avian and primate sex chromosome sequences.

Authors:  Hannah Sundström; Matthew T Webster; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  De novo deletions and duplications detected by array CGH: a study of parental origin in relation to mechanisms of formation and size of imbalance.

Authors:  Charlene Sibbons; Joan K Morris; John A Crolla; Patricia A Jacobs; N Simon Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  A physical map, including a BAC/PAC clone contig, of the Williams-Beuren syndrome--deletion region at 7q11.23.

Authors:  R Peoples; Y Franke; Y K Wang; L Pérez-Jurado; T Paperna; M Cisco; U Francke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Aberrant interchromosomal exchanges are the predominant cause of the 22q11.2 deletion.

Authors:  Sulagna C Saitta; Stacy E Harris; Ann P Gaeth; Deborah A Driscoll; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Melissa K Maisenbacher; Jill M Yersak; Prabir K Chakraborty; April M Hacker; Elaine H Zackai; Terry Ashley; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Comparison of TFII-I gene family members deleted in Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Authors:  Timothy A Hinsley; Pamela Cunliffe; Hannah J Tipney; Andrew Brass; May Tassabehji
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.