Literature DB >> 12075000

Successive olfactory reversal learning in honeybees.

Bernhard Komischke1, Martin Giurfa, Harald Lachnit, Dagmar Malun.   

Abstract

Honeybees Apis mellifera can associate an originally neutral odor with a reinforcement of sucrose solution. Forward pairings of odor and reinforcement enable the odor to release the proboscis extension reflex in consecutive tests. Bees can also be conditioned differentially: They learn to respond to a reinforced odor and not to a nonreinforced one. They can also learn to reverse their choice. Here we ask whether honeybees can learn successive olfactory differential conditioning tasks involving different overlapping pairs of odors. The conditioning schedules were established in order to train the animals with 3, 2, 1, or 0 reversals previous to a last differential conditioning phase in which two additional reversals were present. We studied whether or not successive reversal learning is possible and whether or not learning olfactory discrimination reversals affects the solving of subsequent discrimination reversals. Therefore we compared the responses of bees that had experienced reversals with those of bees that had not experienced such reversals when both are confronted with a new reversal situation. In experiment 1 we showed that bees that had experienced three previous reversals were better in solving the final reversal task than bees with no previous reversal experience. In experiment 2, we showed that one reversal learning is enough for bees to perform better in the final reversal task. The successive different reversals trained in our experiments resemble the natural foraging situation in which a honeybee forager has to switch successively from an initial floral species to different ones. The fact that experiencing such changes seems to improve a bee's performance in dealing with further new exploited food sources has therefore an adaptive impact for the individual and for the colony as a whole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12075000      PMCID: PMC182587          DOI: 10.1101/lm.44602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  18 in total

1.  Associative learning modifies neural representations of odors in the insect brain.

Authors:  T Faber; J Joerges; R Menzel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Odour perception in honeybees: coding information in glomerular patterns.

Authors:  C G Galizia; R Menzel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Configural olfactory learning in honeybees: negative and positive patterning discrimination.

Authors:  N Deisig; H Lachnit; M Giurfa; F Hellstern
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The comparative analysis of learning.

Authors:  M E Bitterman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Learning and memory in honeybees: from behavior to neural substrates.

Authors:  R Menzel; U Muller
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 6.  Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: an appraisal and reconfiguration.

Authors:  J W Rudy; R J Sutherland
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Caste and ecology in the social insects.

Authors:  G F Oster; E O Wilson
Journal:  Monogr Popul Biol       Date:  1978

9.  Learning and memory in the honeybee.

Authors:  M Hammer; R Menzel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  An analysis of synthetic processing of odor mixtures in the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  S Chandra; B H Smith
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  13 in total

1.  Flexibility in assessment of prey cues: frog-eating bats and frog calls.

Authors:  Rachel A Page; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Variation in highbush blueberry floral volatile profiles as a function of pollination status, cultivar, time of day and flower part: implications for flower visitation by bees.

Authors:  Cesar Rodriguez-Saona; Leonardo Parra; Andrés Quiroz; Rufus Isaacs
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Multiple reversal olfactory learning in honeybees.

Authors:  Theo Mota; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  A GABAergic inhibitory neural circuit regulates visual reversal learning in Drosophila.

Authors:  Qingzhong Ren; Hao Li; Yanying Wu; Jing Ren; Aike Guo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Forward and backward second-order Pavlovian conditioning in honeybees.

Authors:  Syed Abid Hussaini; Bernhard Komischke; Randolf Menzel; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  No trade-off between learning speed and associative flexibility in bumblebees: a reversal learning test with multiple colonies.

Authors:  Nigel E Raine; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Memory formation in reversal learning of the honeybee.

Authors:  Ravit Hadar; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  The Memory Trace Supporting Lose-Shift Responding Decays Rapidly after Reward Omission and Is Distinct from Other Learning Mechanisms in Rats.

Authors:  Aaron J Gruber; Rajat Thapa
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-11-17

9.  GABAergic feedback signaling into the calyces of the mushroom bodies enables olfactory reversal learning in honey bees.

Authors:  Constance Boitard; Jean-Marc Devaud; Guillaume Isabel; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Exploring the limits of learning: Segregation of information integration and response selection is required for learning a serial reversal task.

Authors:  Camilo Juan Mininni; B Silvano Zanutto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.