Literature DB >> 10738801

Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.

A Moulin1.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are used widely in humans to assess cochlear function. The standard procedure consists of recording the 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude as a function of the f2 frequency, using a fixed f2/f1 ratio (DPOAE-gram), close to 1.20. DPOAE amplitude, as recorded in the DPOAE-gram, shows a wide range of values in normal-hearing subjects, which can impair the predictive value of the DPOAE-gram for hearing thresholds. This study is aimed at comparing intersubject variability in 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude according to three paradigms: a fixed f2/f1 ratio, such as the DPOAE-gram, a variable ratio DPOAE-gram (f2/f1 adapted to frequency) and an "optimum" DPOAE-gram, where the f2/f1 is adapted both to subject and frequency. The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude has been investigated on 18 normally hearing subjects at ten different f2 frequencies (from 0.75 to 6 kHz), using an f2 fixed, f1 sweep paradigm, and allowed to define, for each frequency, the f2/f1 ratio giving the greatest 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude (or optimum ratio). Results showed a large intersubject variability of the optimum ratio, especially at frequencies below 1.5 kHz, and a significant decrease of the optimum ratio with frequency. The optimum DPOAE-gram was underestimated by up to 5.8 dB on average (up to 14.9 dB for an individual subject) by the fixed ratio DPOAE-gram, and by up to 3 dB on average (up to 10.6 dB for an individual subject) by the variable ratio DPOAE-gram. Intersubject variability was slightly but significantly reduced in the optimum DPOAE-gram versus the fixed-ratio DPOAE-gram. Lastly, correlations between tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emission (TBOAE) amplitudes and maximum DPOAE amplitudes were significantly greater than correlations between TBOAE amplitudes and fixed-ratio DPOAE amplitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738801     DOI: 10.1121/1.428433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates: normative data.

Authors:  Vicky Wei Zhang; Bradley McPherson; Zhi-Guo Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2008-04-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.