BACKGROUND: Soluble silica, a ubiquitous component of the diet, may be the natural ligand for dietary aluminum and may prevent its accumulation and toxicity in animals. However, previous studies on the inhibition of aluminum absorption and toxicity by soluble silica have produced conflicting results. We recently identified a soluble silica polymer, oligomeric silica, that has a much higher affinity for aluminum than does monomeric silica and that may be involved in the sequestration of aluminum. OBJECTIVE: By using (26)Al as a tracer, we investigated the effects of oligomeric and monomeric silica on the bioavailability of aluminum (study 1) and compared the availability of silicon from oligomeric and monomeric silica in the human gastrointestinal tract (study 2). DESIGN: In study 1, three healthy volunteers each ingested aluminum alone (control), aluminum with oligomeric silica (17 mg), and aluminum with monomeric silica (17 mg). In study 2, five healthy volunteers ingested both the oligomeric and monomeric forms of silica (34 mg). Serum and urine samples were analyzed for aluminum and silicon. RESULTS: Oligomeric silica reduced the availability of aluminum by 67% (P = 0.01) compared with the control, whereas monomeric silica had no effect (P = 0.40). Monomeric silica was readily taken up from the gastrointestinal tract and then excreted in urine (53%), whereas oligomeric silica was not detectably absorbed or excreted. CONCLUSIONS: The oligomeric, high-aluminum-affinity form of soluble silica reduces aluminum availability from the human gastrointestinal tract. Its potential role in the amelioration of aluminum toxicity in other biological systems requires attention.
BACKGROUND: Soluble silica, a ubiquitous component of the diet, may be the natural ligand for dietary aluminum and may prevent its accumulation and toxicity in animals. However, previous studies on the inhibition of aluminum absorption and toxicity by soluble silica have produced conflicting results. We recently identified a soluble silica polymer, oligomeric silica, that has a much higher affinity for aluminum than does monomeric silica and that may be involved in the sequestration of aluminum. OBJECTIVE: By using (26)Al as a tracer, we investigated the effects of oligomeric and monomeric silica on the bioavailability of aluminum (study 1) and compared the availability of silicon from oligomeric and monomeric silica in the humangastrointestinal tract (study 2). DESIGN: In study 1, three healthy volunteers each ingested aluminum alone (control), aluminum with oligomeric silica (17 mg), and aluminum with monomeric silica (17 mg). In study 2, five healthy volunteers ingested both the oligomeric and monomeric forms of silica (34 mg). Serum and urine samples were analyzed for aluminum and silicon. RESULTS: Oligomeric silica reduced the availability of aluminum by 67% (P = 0.01) compared with the control, whereas monomeric silica had no effect (P = 0.40). Monomeric silica was readily taken up from the gastrointestinal tract and then excreted in urine (53%), whereas oligomeric silica was not detectably absorbed or excreted. CONCLUSIONS: The oligomeric, high-aluminum-affinity form of soluble silica reduces aluminum availability from the humangastrointestinal tract. Its potential role in the amelioration of aluminumtoxicity in other biological systems requires attention.
Authors: Shanta Raj Bhattarai; Elayaraja Muthuswamy; Amit Wani; Michal Brichacek; Antonio L Castañeda; Stephanie L Brock; David Oupicky Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Daniel Krewski; Robert A Yokel; Evert Nieboer; David Borchelt; Joshua Cohen; Jean Harry; Sam Kacew; Joan Lindsay; Amal M Mahfouz; Virginie Rondeau Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2007 Impact factor: 6.393
Authors: Shivani Sahni; Kelsey M Mangano; Robert R McLean; Marian T Hannan; Douglas P Kiel Journal: Curr Osteoporos Rep Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.096
Authors: Jonathan O Martinez; Michael Evangelopoulos; Ciro Chiappini; Xuewu Liu; Mauro Ferrari; Ennio Tasciotti Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2013-11-16 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Lucyna Lewińska-Preis; Mariola Jabłońska; Monika J Fabiańska; Andrzej Kita Journal: Environ Geochem Health Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 4.609
Authors: Mahmoud Desouky; Ravin Jugdaohsingh; Catherine R McCrohan; Keith N White; Jonathan J Powell Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-03-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Supannee Sripanyakorn; Ravin Jugdaohsingh; Wacharee Dissayabutr; Simon H C Anderson; Richard P H Thompson; Jonathan J Powell Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Ravin Jugdaohsingh; Mario R Calomme; Karen Robinson; Forrest Nielsen; Simon H C Anderson; Patrick D'Haese; Piet Geusens; Nigel Loveridge; Richard P H Thompson; Jonathan J Powell Journal: Bone Date: 2008-05-02 Impact factor: 4.398