Literature DB >> 23242034

Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective study.

Christopher Springer1, Antonino Inferrera, Felix Kawan, André Schumann, Paolo Fornara, Francesco Greco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) represents an evolution of laparoscopy for the treatment for urologic diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of LESS in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery undergoing radical nephrectomy (LESS-RN) for renal cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery who underwent LESS-RN were compared to 31 patients with the same characteristics after conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). LRN was performed between January 2009 and May 2010, and LESS-RNs were performed between June 2010 and November 2011. Demographic data and perioperative and postoperative variables were recorded and analysed.
RESULTS: The mean ASA score in the LESS-RN and LRN groups was 3.2 ± 0.4, and the mean BMI was 32.7 ± 2.1 and 34.2 ± 0.8 kg/m(2), respectively. The mean operative time in the LESS-RN and LRN groups was 143.7 ± 24.3 and 130.6 ± 26.5 min, (p = 0.11), and the mean hospital stay was 3.8 ± 0.8 versus 4.2 ± 1.4 days in the two groups (p = 0.06), respectively. Three and four complications were recorded in the LESS-RN and in the LRN groups, for a mean complication rate of 12 and 12.9 % (p = 0.12), respectively All tumours were organ-confined with negative surgical margins, and the mean R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score for LESS-RN and LRN was 9.78 ± 1.7 and 9.82 ± 1.3 (p = 0.14), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: LESS-RN in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery is equally effective as LRN without compromising on surgical, oncologic short-term and postoperative outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23242034     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-1005-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

1.  The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Authors:  P H K Mak; R C H Campbell; M G Irwin
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.669

2.  Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of retrocaval ureter.

Authors:  Ning Kang; Jun-hui Zhang; Yi-nong Niu; Jian-wen Wang; Xi-quan Tian; Yan Yong; Nian-zeng Xing
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for renal cancer: technique and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; Domenico Veneziano; Sigrid Wagner; Felix Kawan; Nasreldin Mohammed; M Raschid Hoda; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Clinical outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Narasimhan Ragavan; Anja Dietel; Minh Do; Phuc Ho Thi; Holger Till; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.

Authors:  David Canes; Andre Berger; Monish Aron; Ricardo Brandina; David A Goldfarb; Daniel Shoskes; Mihir M Desai; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive?

Authors:  P Fornara; C Doehn; M Seyfarth; D Jocham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Adipocytokine: a new family of inflammatory and immunologic markers of invasiveness in major urologic surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; M Raschid Hoda; Sigrid Wagner; Olaf Reichelt; Antonino Inferrera; Kersten Fischer; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Hybrid transvaginal nephrectomy.

Authors:  Anibal W Branco; Alcides J Branco Filho; William Kondo; Rafael W Noda; Nilton Kawahara; Affonso A H Camargo; Luciano C Stunitz; Jarbas Valente; Marlon Rangel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  The impact of pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and gasless laparoscopy on the systemic and renal hemodynamics.

Authors:  A W Chiu; L S Chang; D H Birkett; R K Babayan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  High-risk laparoscopic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Ioannis Varkarakis; Eleftherios P Chatzidarellis; Charalambos Deliveliotis
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in kidney surgery: clinical experience and future perspectives.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Stavros Kontogiannis; Iason Kyriazis; Ioannis Georgiopoulos; Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors:  Milan Hora; Viktor Eret; Petr Stránský; Ivan Trávníček; Tomáš Urge; Jiří Ferda; Fredrik Petersson; Ondřej Hes
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 1.195

3.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Lin; Mubiao Liu; Haiyan Ye; Jianhui He; Jianguo Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.