Literature DB >> 10718426

Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer.

R de Bree1, E E Deurloo, G B Snow, C R Leemans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The detection of distant metastases at initial evaluation may alter the selection of therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this study the value of screening for distant metastases is evaluated. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
METHODS: The results of screening for distant metastases were retrospectively analyzed in 101 consecutive HNSCC patients with high-risk factors who were scheduled for major surgery. All patients had computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax, bone scintigraphy, examination of the liver by ultrasound and/or CT scan, and blood tests.
RESULTS: Distant metastases were found in 17% of the patients. Patients with four or more clinical lymph node metastases or low jugular lymph node metastases had the highest incidence of distant metastases (33%). CT scan of the thorax detected in 12 patients, lung metastases; in 4, mediastinal lymph node metastases; and in 2, primary lung tumors. Bone scintigraphy detected in four patients bone metastases; in all four patients lung or mediastinal lymph node metastases were also found. Ultrasound and/or CT scan of the liver revealed one patient with metastases. Blood tests did not show any significant difference between patients with or without bone or liver metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening in patients with three or more lymph node metastases, bilateral lymph node metastases, lymph nodes of 6 cm or larger, low jugular lymph node metastases, locoregional tumor recurrence, and second primary tumors revealed distant metastases in 10% or more. CT scan of the thorax is currently the single most important diagnostic technique for screening of distant metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718426     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200003000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  42 in total

1.  Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging and ultrasound in surveillance of head and neck cancer - The 3-year experience of the ENT Department in Poznan.

Authors:  Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Mariola Popko; Karolina Piskadło; Rafał Czepczyński; Aleksandra Stankowska; Tomasz Piętka; Mirosław Dziuk; Witold Szyfter
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  Salvage surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Magis Mandapathil; Marion Roessler; Jochen A Werner; Carl E Silver; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck oncology: the point of view of the radiation oncologist.

Authors:  Jon Cacicedo; Arturo Navarro; Olga Del Hoyo; Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga; Filippo Alongi; Jose A Medina; Olgun Elicin; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile; Pedro Bilbao; Francisco Casquero; Berardino de Bari; Alan Dal Pra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  CT staging and surveillance of the thorax in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: is it necessary?

Authors:  Fergal Glynn; Sinead Brennan; Gerard O'Leary
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Human papilloma virus: differentiating new primary lung cancer versus metastatic disease from previous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Meredith E Giuliani; Ilan Weinreb; Andrew J Hope
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-02-24

6.  Qualitative and quantitative performance of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  S Partovi; A Kohan; J L Vercher-Conejero; C Rubbert; S Margevicius; M D Schluchter; C Gaeta; P Faulhaber; M R Robbin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Isolated skeletal muscle metastasis following successful treatment of laryngeal cancer: case report.

Authors:  John R Klune; Brian Zuckerbraun; Allan Tsung
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-28

8.  Predictive factors for simultaneous distant metastasis in head and neck cancer patients during the diagnostic work-up.

Authors:  Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba; Maria Soriano-Reixach; Ekhiñe Larruscain-Sarasola; Jon Alexander Sistiaga-Suarez; Jose Angel González-García; Amaia Sanchez-Martin; Laura Basterretxea-Badiola; Naiara Sagastibelta; Xabier Altuna-Mariezcurrena
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Metastatic disease in head & neck oncology.

Authors:  Paolo Pisani; Mario Airoldi; Anastasia Allais; Paolo Aluffi Valletti; Mariapina Battista; Marco Benazzo; Roberto Briatore; Salvatore Cacciola; Salvatore Cocuzza; Andrea Colombo; Bice Conti; Alberto Costanzo; Laura Della Vecchia; Nerina Denaro; Cesare Fantozzi; Danilo Galizia; Massimiliano Garzaro; Ida Genta; Gabriela Alejandra Iasi; Marco Krengli; Vincenzo Landolfo; Giovanni Vittorio Lanza; Mauro Magnano; Maurizio Mancuso; Roberto Maroldi; Laura Masini; Marco Carlo Merlano; Marco Piemonte; Silvia Pisani; Adriele Prina-Mello; Luca Prioglio; Maria Gabriella Rugiu; Felice Scasso; Agostino Serra; Guido Valente; Micol Zannetti; Angelo Zigliani
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Role of diagnostic imaging to malignant sinus tumors in presurgical staging.

Authors:  E Fanucci; V Fiaschetti; N Fusco; S Viarani; M Gargari; A Barlattani; E P Assako; G Simonetti
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2009-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.