Literature DB >> 22323112

Osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity of NanoFUSE(®) DBM.

James F Kirk1, Gregg Ritter, Chad Waters, Sonoko Narisawa, José Luis Millán, James D Talton.   

Abstract

Bone graft substitutes have become an essential component in a number of orthopedic applications. Autologous bone has long been the gold standard for bone void fillers. However, the limited supply and morbidity associated with using autologous graft material has led to the development of many different bone graft substitutes. Allogeneic demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has been used extensively to supplement autograft bone because of its inherent osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. Synthetic and natural bone graft substitutes that do not contain growth factors are considered to be osteoconductive only. Bioactive glass has been shown to facilitate graft containment at the operative site as well as activate cellular osteogenesis. In the present study, we present the results of a comprehensive in vitro and in vivo characterization of a combination of allogeneic human bone and bioactive glass bone void filler, NanoFUSE(®) DBM. NanoFUSE(®) DBM is shown to be biocompatible in a number of different assays and has been cleared by the FDA for use in bone filling indications. Data are presented showing the ability of the material to support cell attachment and proliferation on the material thereby demonstrating the osteoconductive nature of the material. NanoFUSE(®) DBM was also shown to be osteoinductive in the mouse thigh muscle model. These data demonstrate that the DBM and bioactive glass combination, NanoFUSE(®) DBM, could be an effective bone graft substitute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22323112      PMCID: PMC3463676          DOI: 10.1007/s10561-012-9297-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank        ISSN: 1389-9333            Impact factor:   1.522


  38 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes in spine surgery: consideration of mineralized and demineralized preparations and growth factor supplementation.

Authors:  S Berven; B K Tay; F S Kleinstueck; D S Bradford
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Mammalian alkaline phosphatase catalysis requires active site structure stabilization via the N-terminal amino acid microenvironment.

Authors:  Marc F Hoylaerts; Lan Ding; Sonoko Narisawa; Soetkin Van Kerckhoven; José Luis Millan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Inductive substratum for osteogenesis in pellets of particulate bone matrix.

Authors:  M R Urist; T A Dowell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1968 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bone formation in implants of partially and wholly demineralized bone matrix. Including observations on acetone-fixed intra and extracellular proteins.

Authors:  M R Urist; B S Strates
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Use of demineralized allogeneic bone implants for the correction of maxillocraniofacial deformities.

Authors:  J B Mulliken; J Glowacki; L B Kaban; J Folkman; J E Murray
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites.

Authors:  E M Younger; M W Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Comparison of human bone marrow stromal cells seeded on calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix.

Authors:  P Kasten; R Luginbühl; M van Griensven; T Barkhausen; C Krettek; M Bohner; U Bosch
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses.

Authors:  J Wilson; G H Pigott; F J Schoen; L L Hench
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1981-11

9.  Fracture and herniation of bowel at bone graft donor site in the iliac crest.

Authors:  C S Ubhi; D L Morris
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  The role of a composite, demineralized bone matrix and bone marrow in the treatment of osseous defects.

Authors:  J J Tiedeman; K L Garvin; T A Kile; J F Connolly
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Orthobiologics in the augmentation of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  J Tracy Watson; Daemeon A Nicolaou
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Comparative Efficacy of Commonly Available Human Bone Graft Substitutes as Tested for Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.

Authors:  Neil Bhamb; Linda E A Kanim; Susan Drapeau; Suneeth Mohan; Erick Vasquez; Dan Shimko; William McKAY; Hyun W Bae
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

3.  Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Shalash; Hatem A Rahman; Amr A Azim; Amani H Neemat; Hesham E Hawary; Sherine A Nasry
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.