Literature DB >> 10715333

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection at CT angiography.

P Batra1, B Bigoni, J Manning, D R Aberle, K Brown, E Hart, J Goldin.   

Abstract

Two hundred seventy-five computed tomographic (CT) angiograms of the thoracic aorta were obtained over a period of approximately 4 years in patients with suspected or known aortic dissection. In all cases, unenhanced images were initially obtained, followed by contrast material-enhanced images. A variety of pitfalls were encountered that mimicked aortic dissection. These pitfalls were attributable to technical factors (eg, improper timing of contrast material administration relative to image acquisition); streak artifacts generated by high-attenuation material, high-contrast interfaces, or cardiac motion; periaortic structures (eg, aortic arch branches, mediastinal veins, pericardial recess, thymus, atelectasis, pleural thickening or effusion adjacent to the aorta); aortic wall motion and normal aortic sinuses; aortic variations such as congenital ductus diverticulum and acquired aortic aneurysm with thrombus; and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Although several of these pitfalls are easy to recognize and therefore unlikely to present a diagnostic problem, others are potentially confusing. Familiarity with these common pitfalls, coupled with a knowledge of normal intrathoracic anatomy, will facilitate recognition of true aortic dissection and help avoid misdiagnosis at thoracic aortic CT angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10715333     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc04309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  35 in total

1.  Characterization of artifact simulating aortic dissection in computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  C K Parry; B Rajagopalan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Multidetector CT evaluation of various aortic diseases: diagnostic tips, pitfalls, and remedies for imaging artifacts.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Park; Sang Il Choi; Eun Ju Chun
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  CT of thoracic aortic disease.

Authors:  M J Lipton
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Imaging of aortic dissection by helical computed tomography (CT).

Authors:  Serge Willoteaux; Christophe Lions; Virginia Gaxotte; Ziad Negaiwi; J P Beregi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Prospective ECG-gated 320-row CT angiography of the whole aorta and coronary arteries.

Authors:  Yu Li; Zhanming Fan; Lei Xu; Lin Yang; Haiyan Xin; Nan Zhang; Zhaoqi Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Low dose dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Cormac Farrelly; Amir Davarpanah; Aoife N Keeling; John Sheehan; Ann Ragin; Vahid Yaghmai; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Evaluation of pericardial sinuses and recesses with 2-, 4-, 16-, and 64-row multidetector CT.

Authors:  C A Ozmen; M G Akpinar; H O Akay; F B Demirkazik; M Ariyurek
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Computed Tomography Imaging Artifact Simulating Type A Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Alan S Chou; Bulat A Ziganshin; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 9.  Imaging findings of acute intravascular thrombus on non-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Ryan T Whitesell; Scott D Steenburg
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-03-21

10.  Acute aortic syndromes: a second look at dual-phase CT.

Authors:  Andrew J Lovy; Jessica K Rosenblum; Jeffrey M Levsky; Alla Godelman; Benjamin Zalta; Vineet R Jain; Linda B Haramati
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.