Literature DB >> 20177979

Evaluation of pericardial sinuses and recesses with 2-, 4-, 16-, and 64-row multidetector CT.

C A Ozmen1, M G Akpinar, H O Akay, F B Demirkazik, M Ariyurek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe visualisation rate and appearance of all pericardial sinuses and recesses and to evaluate whether there is a significant difference between visualisation of these sinuses and recesses on 2-, 4-, 16- and 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 588 MDCT scans of the chest obtained with a protocol for pulmonary embolism.
RESULTS: The visualisation rate of any pericardial recess was 85.2%. The rates on 2-, 4-, 16- and 64-slice MDCT were 74.7%, 90.6%, 90.3% and 88.7%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in visualisation rates of pericardial recesses between 2-slice MDCT and other MDCT systems (p<0.01). Age, and 4-, 16- and 64-slice MDCT versus 2-slice MDCT and the presence of pleural effusion appeared as significant predictors of the presence of any recess.
CONCLUSIONS: Visualisation rates of pericardial recesses are higher with 4-, 16- and 64-slice MDCT than with 2-slice MDCT. Therefore, radiologists need to be familiar with the different appearances of pericardial recesses on MDCT to avoid misdiagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177979     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0532-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  19 in total

1.  The "High-Riding" superior pericardial recess: CT findings.

Authors:  Y W Choi; H P McAdams; S C Jeon; H S Seo; C K Hahm
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Anatomy of pericardial recesses on multidetector CT: implications for oncologic imaging.

Authors:  Mylene T Truong; Jeremy J Erasmus; Gregory W Gladish; Bradley S Sabloff; Edith M Marom; John E Madewell; Marvin H Chasen; Reginald F Munden
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Pericardial "sleeve" recess of right inferior pulmonary vein mimicking adenopathy: computed tomography findings.

Authors:  Mylene T Truong; Jeremy J Erasmus; Bradley S Sabloff; Edith M Marom; Gregory W Gladish; Marvin H Chasen; Reginald F Munden
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Effusion in the superior pericardial recess simulating a mediastinal mass.

Authors:  H T Winer-Muram; R E Gold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  MDCT evaluation of the cardiac venous system.

Authors:  D Lumia; D Laganà; A Canì; M Mangini; A Giorgianni; T Cafaro; E Bertolotti; S Rizzo; E Cotta; F Caravati; I Caico; C Vite; G Carrafiello; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Cross-sectional anatomy of the pericardial sinuses, recesses, and adjacent structures.

Authors:  T M Vesely; D R Cahill
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Fluid collection in the pericardial sinuses and recesses. Thin-section helical computed tomography observations and hypothesis.

Authors:  H Kubota; C Sato; M Ohgushi; T Haku; K Sasaki; K Yamaguchi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Left pulmonic recess of the pericardium: findings at CT and MR imaging.

Authors:  Z Protopapas; J L Westcott
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The superior sinus of the pericardium: CT appearance.

Authors:  D J Aronberg; R R Peterson; H S Glazer; S S Sagel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  CT evaluation of distended pericardial recess presenting as a mediastinal mass.

Authors:  M S Shin; P R Jolles; K J Ho
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Hemopericardium in the acute clinical setting: Are we ready for a tailored management approach on the basis of MDCT findings?

Authors:  Tullio Valente; Maria Pignatiello; Giacomo Sica; Giorgio Bocchini; Gaetano Rea; Salvatore Cappabianca; Mariano Scaglione
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.469

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.