Literature DB >> 29725929

Automatic Bayes Factors for Testing Equality- and Inequality-Constrained Hypotheses on Variances.

Florian Böing-Messing1,2, Joris Mulder3.   

Abstract

In comparing characteristics of independent populations, researchers frequently expect a certain structure of the population variances. These expectations can be formulated as hypotheses with equality and/or inequality constraints on the variances. In this article, we consider the Bayes factor for testing such (in)equality-constrained hypotheses on variances. Application of Bayes factors requires specification of a prior under every hypothesis to be tested. However, specifying subjective priors for variances based on prior information is a difficult task. We therefore consider so-called automatic or default Bayes factors. These methods avoid the need for the user to specify priors by using information from the sample data. We present three automatic Bayes factors for testing variances. The first is a Bayes factor with equal priors on all variances, where the priors are specified automatically using a small share of the information in the sample data. The second is the fractional Bayes factor, where a fraction of the likelihood is used for automatic prior specification. The third is an adjustment of the fractional Bayes factor such that the parsimony of inequality-constrained hypotheses is properly taken into account. The Bayes factors are evaluated by investigating different properties such as information consistency and large sample consistency. Based on this evaluation, it is concluded that the adjusted fractional Bayes factor is generally recommendable for testing equality- and inequality-constrained hypotheses on variances.

Keywords:  default Bayes factor; fractional Bayes factor; heterogeneity; heteroscedasticity; homogeneity of variance; inequality constraint

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29725929     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-018-9615-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  11 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data.

Authors:  R J Grissom
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-02

2.  Fisher Lecture: the 2002 R. A. Fisher lecture: dedicated to the memory of Shanti S. Gupta. Variances are not always nuisance parameters.

Authors:  Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Inequality constrained analysis of variance: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Irene Klugkist; Olav Laudy; Herbert Hoijtink
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-12

4.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

Review 5.  Reaction time variability in ADHD: a meta-analytic review of 319 studies.

Authors:  Michael J Kofler; Mark D Rapport; Dustin E Sarver; Joseph S Raiker; Sarah A Orban; Lauren M Friedman; Ellen G Kolomeyer
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-06-13

6.  Bayesian evaluation of constrained hypotheses on variances of multiple independent groups.

Authors:  Florian Böing-Messing; Marcel A L M van Assen; Abe D Hofman; Herbert Hoijtink; Joris Mulder
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-06

7.  Bayesian tests of measurement invariance.

Authors:  A J Verhagen; J P Fox
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Bayes factors for testing inequality constrained hypotheses: Issues with prior specification.

Authors:  Joris Mulder
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Greater intrasex phenotype variability in males than in females is a fundamental aspect of the gender differences in humans.

Authors:  Anne-Catherine Lehre; Knut P Lehre; Petter Laake; Niels C Danbolt
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Response variability in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a neuronal and glial energetics hypothesis.

Authors:  Vivienne A Russell; Robert D Oades; Rosemary Tannock; Peter R Killeen; Judith G Auerbach; Espen B Johansen; Terje Sagvolden
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bayesian Inference: Understanding Experimental Data With Informative Hypotheses.

Authors:  Sabeeh A Baig
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Simple Bayesian testing of scientific expectations in linear regression models.

Authors:  J Mulder; A Olsson-Collentine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.