P M Maceneaney1, D E Malone. 1. Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Abstract
AIMS: To design a spreadsheet program to: (a) analyse rapidly diagnostic test result data produced in local research or reported in the literature; (b) correct reported predictive values for disease prevalence in any population; (c) estimate the post-test probability of disease in individual patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microsoft Excel(TM)was used. Section A: a contingency (2 x 2) table was incorporated into the spreadsheet. Formulae for standard calculations [sample size, disease prevalence, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, predictive values and likelihood ratios (LRs)] were linked to this table. The results change automatically when the data in the true or false negative and positive cells are changed. Section B: this estimates predictive values in any population, compensating for altered disease prevalence. Sections C-F: Bayes' theorem was incorporated to generate individual post-test probabilities. The spreadsheet generates 95% confidence intervals, LRs and a table and graph of conditional probabilities once the sensitivity and specificity of the test are entered. The latter shows the expected post-test probability of disease for any pre-test probability when a test of known sensitivity and specificity is positive or negative. RESULTS: This spreadsheet can be used on desktop and palmtop computers. The MS Excel(TM)version can be downloaded via the Internet from the URL ftp://radiography.com/pub/Rad-data99.xls CONCLUSION: A spreadsheet is useful for contingency table data analysis and assessment of the clinical meaning of diagnostic test results. Copyright 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.
AIMS: To design a spreadsheet program to: (a) analyse rapidly diagnostic test result data produced in local research or reported in the literature; (b) correct reported predictive values for disease prevalence in any population; (c) estimate the post-test probability of disease in individual patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microsoft Excel(TM)was used. Section A: a contingency (2 x 2) table was incorporated into the spreadsheet. Formulae for standard calculations [sample size, disease prevalence, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, predictive values and likelihood ratios (LRs)] were linked to this table. The results change automatically when the data in the true or false negative and positive cells are changed. Section B: this estimates predictive values in any population, compensating for altered disease prevalence. Sections C-F: Bayes' theorem was incorporated to generate individual post-test probabilities. The spreadsheet generates 95% confidence intervals, LRs and a table and graph of conditional probabilities once the sensitivity and specificity of the test are entered. The latter shows the expected post-test probability of disease for any pre-test probability when a test of known sensitivity and specificity is positive or negative. RESULTS: This spreadsheet can be used on desktop and palmtop computers. The MS Excel(TM)version can be downloaded via the Internet from the URL ftp://radiography.com/pub/Rad-data99.xls CONCLUSION: A spreadsheet is useful for contingency table data analysis and assessment of the clinical meaning of diagnostic test results. Copyright 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.
Authors: R P Killeen; A Gupta; H Delaney; C E Johnson; A J Tsiouris; J Comunale; M E Fink; H S Mangat; A Z Segal; A I Mushlin; P C Sanelli Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ronan P Killeen; Alvin I Mushlin; Carl E Johnson; Joseph P Comunale; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Holly Delaney; Allison Dunning; Pina C Sanelli Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-06-11 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Justin M Belcher; Arun J Sanyal; Aldo J Peixoto; Mark A Perazella; Joseph Lim; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Naheed Ansari; Steven G Coca; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Hepatology Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Evan Tang; Sumaya Dano; Nathaniel Edwards; Sara Macanovic; Heather Ford; Susan Bartlett; Doris Howell; Madeline Li; Marta Novak; Istvan Mucsi Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 4.147