Literature DB >> 10708618

The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.

P M Maceneaney1, D E Malone.   

Abstract

AIMS: To design a spreadsheet program to: (a) analyse rapidly diagnostic test result data produced in local research or reported in the literature; (b) correct reported predictive values for disease prevalence in any population; (c) estimate the post-test probability of disease in individual patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microsoft Excel(TM)was used. Section A: a contingency (2 x 2) table was incorporated into the spreadsheet. Formulae for standard calculations [sample size, disease prevalence, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, predictive values and likelihood ratios (LRs)] were linked to this table. The results change automatically when the data in the true or false negative and positive cells are changed. Section B: this estimates predictive values in any population, compensating for altered disease prevalence. Sections C-F: Bayes' theorem was incorporated to generate individual post-test probabilities. The spreadsheet generates 95% confidence intervals, LRs and a table and graph of conditional probabilities once the sensitivity and specificity of the test are entered. The latter shows the expected post-test probability of disease for any pre-test probability when a test of known sensitivity and specificity is positive or negative.
RESULTS: This spreadsheet can be used on desktop and palmtop computers. The MS Excel(TM)version can be downloaded via the Internet from the URL ftp://radiography.com/pub/Rad-data99.xls
CONCLUSION: A spreadsheet is useful for contingency table data analysis and assessment of the clinical meaning of diagnostic test results. Copyright 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708618     DOI: 10.1053/crad.1999.0444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  11 in total

1.  Appropriate use of CT perfusion following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a Bayesian analysis approach.

Authors:  R P Killeen; A Gupta; H Delaney; C E Johnson; A J Tsiouris; J Comunale; M E Fink; H S Mangat; A Z Segal; A I Mushlin; P C Sanelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  International comparison of clinicians' ability to identify depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression of predictors.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Sanjay Rao; Amol Vaze
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  How to perform a critical appraisal of diagnostic tests: 7 steps.

Authors:  Aamer Chughtai; Aine Marie Kelly; Paul Cronin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09

4.  Proteomic identification of early biomarkers of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in children.

Authors:  Prasad Devarajan; Catherine D Krawczeski; Mai T Nguyen; Thelma Kathman; Zhu Wang; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Comparison of CT perfusion and digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of delayed cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Ronan P Killeen; Alvin I Mushlin; Carl E Johnson; Joseph P Comunale; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Holly Delaney; Allison Dunning; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature.

Authors:  Jonathan D Dodd; Peter M MacEneaney; Dermot E Malone
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Kidney biomarkers and differential diagnosis of patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Justin M Belcher; Arun J Sanyal; Aldo J Peixoto; Mark A Perazella; Joseph Lim; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Naheed Ansari; Steven G Coca; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  A search strategy to identify studies on the prognosis of work disability: a diagnostic test framework.

Authors:  Rob Kok; Jos A H M Verbeek; Babs Faber; Frank J H van Dijk; Jan L Hoving
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Screening for symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients treated with renal replacement therapy: utility of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised.

Authors:  Evan Tang; Sumaya Dano; Nathaniel Edwards; Sara Macanovic; Heather Ford; Susan Bartlett; Doris Howell; Madeline Li; Marta Novak; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Diagnosing flow residuals in coiled cerebral aneurysms by MR angiography: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Menke; Peter Schramm; Jan Martin Sohns; Kai Kallenberg; Wieland Staab
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.