Literature DB >> 10704777

Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech.

J Kalinowski1, A Stuart, M P Rastatter, G Snyder, V Dayalu.   

Abstract

A novel phenomenon of fluency enhancement via visual gestures of speech in the absence of traditional auditory feedback is reported herein. The effect on visual choral speech on stuttering frequency was investigated. Ten participants who stuttered recited memorized text aloud under two conditions. In a visual choral speech (VCS) condition participants were instructed to focus their gaze on the face, lips and jaw of a research assistant who 'silently mouthed' the text in unison. In a control condition, participants recited memorized text to the research assistant who sat motionless. A statistically significant (P=0.0025) reduction of approximately 80% in stuttering frequency was observed in the VCS condition. As visual linguistic cues are sufficient to activate the auditory cortex, one may speculate that VCS induces fluency in a similar yet undetermined manner as altered auditory feedback does.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10704777     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)00850-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  7 in total

1.  Speech disruption during delayed auditory feedback with simultaneous visual feedback.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; Danielle Striemer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Measurement of speech effort during fluency-inducing conditions in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Erin Jang; Lauren Yates; John Cotton; Irene Seybold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Phonation interval modification and speech performance quality during fluency-inducing conditions by adults who stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Yuedong Wang; Krystal Purkhiser; Anneliese New
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  The effects of gated speech on the fluency of speakers who stutter.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.849

5.  Retraining speech production and fluency in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Maya L Henry; H Isabel Hubbard; Stephanie M Grasso; Maria Luisa Mandelli; Stephen M Wilson; Mithra T Sathishkumar; Julius Fridriksson; Wylin Daigle; Adam L Boxer; Bruce L Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production.

Authors:  Jennifer Chesters; Ladan Baghai-Ravary; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter.

Authors:  Ana Paula Ritto; Julia Biancalana Costa; Fabiola Staróbole Juste; Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.365

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.