Literature DB >> 10700618

Detection of feigned recognition memory impairment using the old/new effect of the event-related potential.

H P Tardif1, R J Barry, A M Fox, S J Johnstone.   

Abstract

Twenty-four undergraduate university students with no known neurological disorders completed the Recognition Memory Test (Warrington, A., 1984. Recognition Memory Test manual. Windsor, Berkshire: NFER-Nelson.) while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Twelve subjects were instructed to feign a recognition memory deficit (malingering group), while the remainder served as controls. The malingerers performed poorly on the test compared to the control group. The 'old/new effect', an ERP measure thought to reflect recognition memory processes, did not differ between the groups, indicating recognition of previously learned material in the malingering group despite poor test performance. The study also revealed a second, early, old/new effect, maximal at left frontal sites in the malingering relative to the control group, suggesting task-related processing differences between the two groups. These effects appear to be of potential value in the detection of malingering of cognitive impairment in the clinical situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10700618     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00083-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  6 in total

Review 1.  The orientating reflex: the "targeting reaction" and "searchlight of attention".

Authors:  E N Sokolov; N I Nezlina; V B Polyanskii; D V Evtikhin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

2.  Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.

Authors:  Yu-Hui Lo; Philip Tseng
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Distinguishing Between Genuine and Feigned Dementia Using Event-related Potentials.

Authors:  August M Price; Rocco Palumbo; Anna Marin; Prayerna Uppal; Cheongmin Suh; Andrew E Budson; Katherine W Turk
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.590

4.  New measures to detect malingered neurocognitive deficit: applying reaction time and event-related potentials.

Authors:  Victoria L Vagnini; David T R Berry; Jessica A Clark; Yang Jiang
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 2.475

5.  "I didn't want to do it!" The detection of past intentions.

Authors:  Andrea Zangrossi; Sara Agosta; Gessica Cervesato; Federica Tessarotto; Giuseppe Sartori
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Electrophysiological Correlates of the Autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT): Response Conflict and Conflict Resolution.

Authors:  Maddalena Marini; Sara Agosta; Giuseppe Sartori
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.