Literature DB >> 18608662

New measures to detect malingered neurocognitive deficit: applying reaction time and event-related potentials.

Victoria L Vagnini1, David T R Berry, Jessica A Clark, Yang Jiang.   

Abstract

The ability of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), reaction times (RTs), and event-related potentials (ERPs) to detect malingered neurocognitive deficit (MNCD) was examined in 32 normal individuals answering under honest (HON; n = 16) or malingering (MAL; n = 16) instructions as well as in 15 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who answered under honest instructions. Overall, the TOMM was the most effective at classifying groups. However, new accuracy, RT, and ERP measures reached promising hit rates in the range of 71-88%. In particular, the difference in frontal versus posterior ERP obtained during an old-new task was effective at classifying MAL versus TBI (hit rate = 87%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18608662      PMCID: PMC3649037          DOI: 10.1080/13803390701754746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  20 in total

1.  How well do standard clinical neuropsychological tests identify malingering? A preliminary analysis.

Authors:  W G van Gorp; L A Humphrey; A L Kalechstein; V L Brumm; W J McMullen; M A Stoddard; N A Pachana
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  Detection of feigned recognition memory impairment using the old/new effect of the event-related potential.

Authors:  H P Tardif; R J Barry; A M Fox; S J Johnstone
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Kevin A Johnson; Qiwen Mu; Emily L Grenesko; Steven J Laken; Mark S George
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  Y M Cycowicz; D Friedman; M Rothstein; J G Snodgrass
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1997-05

5.  Identifying simulators of cognitive deficit through combined use of neuropsychological test performance and event-related potentials.

Authors:  J Ellwanger; W N Tenhula; J P Rosenfeld; J J Sweet
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  Use of the Stroop phenomenon as a diagnostic tool for malingering.

Authors:  A Osimani; A Alon; A Berger; J M Abarbanel
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  P300 correlates of simulated malingered amnesia in a matching-to-sample task: topographic analyses of deception versus truthtelling responses.

Authors:  J P Rosenfeld; A M Reinhart; M Bhatt; J Ellwanger; K Gora; M Sekera; J Sweet
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Assessing believable deficits on measures of attention and information processing capacity.

Authors:  E Strauss; F Spellacy; M Hunter; T Berry
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 10.  Memory and consciousness: a selective review of issues and data.

Authors:  M D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Response Time Measures as Supplementary Validity Indicators in Forced-Choice Recognition Memory Performance Validity Tests: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yoram Braw
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment in severe traumatic brain injury patients with the Forced-choice Graphics Memory Test.

Authors:  Zilong Liu; Juan Dong; Xiaohong Zhao; Xiaorui Chen; Sara M Lippa; Jerome S Caroselli; Xiang Fang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Discriminating Fake From True Brain Injury Using Latency of Left Frontal Neural Responses During Old/New Memory Recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer Neal; Stephanie Strothkamp; Esias Bedingar; Patrick Cordero; Benjamin Wagner; Victoria Vagnini; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.