Literature DB >> 10699657

Skilled forelimb reaching for pasta guided by tactile input in the rat as measured by accuracy, spatial adjustments, and force.

M Ballermann1, G Tompkins, I Q Whishaw.   

Abstract

Rats are capable of reaching for food with a single forelimb, but since they locate the target of their reach using olfaction, it is unclear how they adjust their limb movement to compensate for errors. Although it is thought that their reaching movement is ballistic and can only be adjusted by trial and error, whether they can use haptic cues to aid in locating and identifying a target has not been examined. The present study addressed this question by allowing rats to reach through a slot for rigidly held pieces of uncooked pasta of varying thickness, which could be oriented vertically or horizontally from different points around the slot and which were attached to a force transducer. The tasks required that animals not only adjust their reach and grasp to the target's location but also identify the target based on its texture. Acquisition curves were made of head orientation, limb transport trajectories, number of attempts per success, paw orientation, breaking direction and force of the grasp. A haptic discrimination test used pasta and similar sized metal rods with different tactile properties as discriminanda. The results indicated that whereas postural orientation and limb transport trajectory were not modified as a function of target orientation, paw orientation and grasp force did vary as a function of the sensory qualities of the target object, and the rats could make a haptic discriminative choice of a target object. The results show that the rat is capable of adjusting paw movements using haptic information, suggesting that somatosensory features of sensorimotor control of limb and paw movements in carnivores and primates are shared by rodents. This commonality points to a conservation of motor control in mammals, explains some of the idiosyncratic features of rat reaching behavior, and confirms that rodents provide a good model for investigating sensorimotor functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699657     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00164-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  An inexpensive and automated method for presenting olfactory or tactile stimuli to rats in a two-choice discrimination task.

Authors:  Iver H Iversen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Feed-forward control of preshaping in the rat is mediated by the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Jason B Carmel; Sangsoo Kim; Marcel Brus-Ramer; John H Martin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 3.  Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Exposure to repetitive tasks induces motor changes related to skill acquisition and inflammation in rats.

Authors:  David M Kietrys; Ann E Barr; Mary F Barbe
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  A dystonia mouse model with motor and sequencing deficits paralleling human disease.

Authors:  Krista Kernodle; Allison M Bakerian; Allison Cropsey; William T Dauer; Daniel K Leventhal
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The Knob Supination Task: A Semi-automated Method for Assessing Forelimb Function in Rats.

Authors:  Samuel D Butensky; Thelma Bethea; Joshua Santos; Anil Sindhurakar; Eric Meyers; Andrew M Sloan; Robert L Rennaker; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Translational Challenges of Rat Models of Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Laura Krisa; Madeline Runyen; Megan Ryan Detloff
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018

8.  Evaluation of Five Tests for Sensitivity to Functional Deficits following Cervical or Thoracic Dorsal Column Transection in the Rat.

Authors:  Nitish D Fagoe; Callan L Attwell; Ruben Eggers; Lizz Tuinenbreijer; Dorette Kouwenhoven; Joost Verhaagen; Matthew R J Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Dorsal Column Lesion Model of Spinal Cord Injury and Its Use in Deciphering the Neuron-Intrinsic Injury Response.

Authors:  Callan L Attwell; Mike van Zwieten; Joost Verhaagen; Matthew R J Mason
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.