OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' use of the Internet to obtain medical information, their opinions on the quality of medical Web sites, and their attitudes towards Internet-based consultations. DESIGN: Questionnaire study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 398 patients, aged 10-95 years, visiting the orthopaedic outpatient clinics of a London district general hospital over a 2-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (i) The rate of Internet use by patients; (ii) the perception of the quality of medical web sites; (iii) future intentions and attitudes towards Internet-based consultations; and (iv) concurrence between information obtained from Web sites and advice given by the orthopaedic surgeon in the clinic. RESULTS: From 369 respondents (response rate 93%), 55.3% of patients had accessed the Internet. Of these, 52.0% had obtained medical information from this source. Access was linearly correlated with age (r2 = 0.975, P < 0.01) and was also related to social status. Of the 12.3% of patients who had researched their particular orthopaedic condition, 20% reported that the advice received from the surgeon in the clinic contradicted that obtained from the Internet. A total of 35.7% of patients would undergo an Internet-based consultation, whilst a further 25.5% would consider this, depending on the medical condition in question. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the patients studied were willing to access the Internet for medical information, with younger patients more likely to undertake this activity. Moreover, a significant proportion of respondents were willing to undergo an Internet-based consultation. The increased use of medical Web sites by patients raises important issues regarding the need for quality control, and impacts significantly upon the surgeon-patient relationship.
OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' use of the Internet to obtain medical information, their opinions on the quality of medical Web sites, and their attitudes towards Internet-based consultations. DESIGN: Questionnaire study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 398 patients, aged 10-95 years, visiting the orthopaedic outpatient clinics of a London district general hospital over a 2-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (i) The rate of Internet use by patients; (ii) the perception of the quality of medical web sites; (iii) future intentions and attitudes towards Internet-based consultations; and (iv) concurrence between information obtained from Web sites and advice given by the orthopaedic surgeon in the clinic. RESULTS: From 369 respondents (response rate 93%), 55.3% of patients had accessed the Internet. Of these, 52.0% had obtained medical information from this source. Access was linearly correlated with age (r2 = 0.975, P < 0.01) and was also related to social status. Of the 12.3% of patients who had researched their particular orthopaedic condition, 20% reported that the advice received from the surgeon in the clinic contradicted that obtained from the Internet. A total of 35.7% of patients would undergo an Internet-based consultation, whilst a further 25.5% would consider this, depending on the medical condition in question. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the patients studied were willing to access the Internet for medical information, with younger patients more likely to undertake this activity. Moreover, a significant proportion of respondents were willing to undergo an Internet-based consultation. The increased use of medical Web sites by patients raises important issues regarding the need for quality control, and impacts significantly upon the surgeon-patient relationship.
Authors: M A Winker; A Flanagin; B Chi-Lum; J White; K Andrews; R L Kennett; C D DeAngelis; R A Musacchio Journal: JAMA Date: 2000 Mar 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joseph F Baker; Brian M Devitt; Paul D Kiely; James Green; Kevin J Mulhall; Keith A Synnott; Ashley R Poynton Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-04-02 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: M Tyrrell Burrus; Brian C Werner; James S Starman; Gregory M Kurkis; Jonathan M Pierre; David R Diduch; Joseph M Hart Journal: HSS J Date: 2017-08-23
Authors: Alex Macario; Peter Schilling; Richard Rubio; Amandeep Bhalla; Stuart Goodman Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 2.655