Literature DB >> 10693241

Risk analysis in esophageal surgery.

H Bartels1, H J Stein, J R Siewert.   

Abstract

The postoperative mortality after esophagectomy still remains a major factor influencing the prognosis of esophageal cancer and largely depends on the patient's preoperative physiological status. A composite scoring system was developed to predict the risk of esophagectomy, based on quantitative assessment of preoperatively available physiological parameters. The scoring system was reviewed retrospectively on operated patients and evaluated prospectively in two subsequent patient groups. An initial retrospective multivariate analysis of 432 esophagectomy patients identified a compromised general status (p = 0.001) and poor cardiac (p < 0.001), hepatic (p < 0.05), and respiratory (p < 0.05) functions as independent predictors of a fatal postoperative course. Based on the relative risks associated with individual impaired organ functions--general status 3.6, cardiac function 2.8, hepatic function 2.1, pulmonary function 1.7--a composite risk score was established. A prospective study in 121 patients confirmed that this composite scoring system provides better identification of high-risk patients than does any of the individual parameters alone. Including this composite score into the process of patient selection and choice of procedure resulted in a decrease of postoperative mortality from 9.4% (52/553) to 1.2% (4/323) (p = 0.001). The risk of death after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer can be objectively assessed prior to surgery and quantified by a composite risk score. This score provides a useful tool in refining the criteria of patient selection for resection and choice of procedure, and markedly reduces postoperative mortality when applied prospectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693241     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res        ISSN: 0080-0015


  13 in total

1.  Outcome, complications, and mortality of an intrathoracic anastomosis in esophageal cancer in patients without a preoperative selection with a risk score.

Authors:  Ingo Alldinger; Leila Sisic; Marcel Hochreiter; Wilko Weichert; Susanne Blank; Maria Burian; Lars Grenacher; Tom Bruckner; Jens Werner; Markus W Büchler; Katja Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Tian Wei; Yuan-Chuan Zhang; Xiang-Bing Deng; Ting-Han Yang; Ya-Zhou He; Zi-Qiang Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Technical and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Ross F Goldberg; Steven P Bowers; Michael Parker; John A Stauffer; Horacio J Asbun; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: response evaluation by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  B L Brücher; W Weber; M Bauer; U Fink; N Avril; H J Stein; M Werner; F Zimmerman; J R Siewert; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world.

Authors:  J R Siewert; H J Stein; M Feith; B L Bruecher; H Bartels; U Fink
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  [Esophagectomy as therapeutic principle for squamous cell esophageal cancer].

Authors:  J R Siewert; M Feith; H J Stein
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Multimodal treatment of gastrointestinal tract tumors: consequences for surgery.

Authors:  J Rüdiger Siewert; Hubert J Stein; Burkhard H A von Rahden
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  [Therapy of mediastinitis in patients with esophageal cancer].

Authors:  H Bartels; J R Siewert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  The Value of PET Imaging in Patients with Localized Gastroesophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Ken Herrmann; Bernd-Joachim Krause; Florian Lordick
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11

10.  Minimally invasive transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Böttger; A Terzic; M Müller; A Rodehorst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.