Literature DB >> 17479338

Minimally invasive transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy.

T Böttger1, A Terzic, M Müller, A Rodehorst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard esophagectomy requires either a laparotomy with transhiatal removal of the esophagus or a combination of laparotomy and thoracotomy. Currently, it still is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Complications leading to greater morbidity and mortality are rarely seen after minimally invasive surgery. The authors present their experience with 25 minimally invasive esophageal resections.
METHODS: Between August 1st, 2003 and November 30th, 2005, the authors performed 25 minimally invasive esophageal resections for 4 woman and 21 men. Data were acquired prospectively.
RESULTS: In this series, a laparoscopic transhiatal approach was performed in 9 cases, a combined laparoscopic-thoracoscopic procedure in 12 cases, and laparoscopic creation of a gastric tube combined with thoracotomy in 4 cases. No conversion became necessary. The mean operation time was 165 min (range, 150-180 min) for the laparoscopic transhiatal approach and 300 min (range, 240-360 min) for both combination approaches. Using the combined laparoscopic-thoracoscopic procedure, 23 lymph nodes (range, 19-26 lymph nodes) were removed, and using the laparoscopic transhiatal approach, 14 lymph nodes (range, 12-17 lymph nodes) were removed. The median stay in the intensive care unit was 1.5 days (range, 1-22 days), and the overall postoperative stay was 10 days (range, 7-153 days). Two intraoperative complications and two cervical anastomotic leakages were observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%.
CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that laparoscopic transhiatal and combined laparoscopic/thoracoscopic esophagectomy are feasible and can be performed with low rates of morbidity and mortality. Due to an equal extent of lymph node dissection, there should be no difference in long-term survival between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17479338     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9178-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  21 in total

1.  Oesophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; A R Parenti; A Ruol; M Costantini; S Merigliano; E Ancona
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; P H Lemoine; P F Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  [The technique of laparoscopic-thoracoscopic esophageal resection for esophageal cancer--first experiences].

Authors:  S Saad; P Goh; M Nagelschmidt
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.942

4.  A comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resections on the prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  T Junginger; I Gockel; S Heckhoff
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Laparoscopic total esophagectomy.

Authors:  L L Swanstrom; P Hansen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-09

6.  Minimal invasive approach of gastric and esophageal mobilization in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: total laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  S K H Wong; A C W Chan; D W H Lee; E W H To; E K W Ng; S C S Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Role of videoassisted surgery in the treatment of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  J M Collard
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1995

Review 9.  [Traditional esophagectomy and esophago-gastrectomy vs. laparoscopic surgery. Evaluation and results].

Authors:  F Badessi; G P Gusai; D Fais; C Huscher
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.098

10.  Morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: a risk analysis.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Christoph Exner; Theodor Junginger
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction.

Authors:  Nick Butler; Stuart Collins; Breda Memon; Muhammed Ashraf Memon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Hannes G Kenngott; Jochen Neuhaus; Christof M Sommer; Tobias Gehrig; Armin Kolb; Matthias Gondan; Boris A Radeleff; Anja Schaible; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Computer tomographic analysis of organ motion caused by respiration and intraoperative pneumoperitoneum in a porcine model for navigated minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Hannes G Kenngott; Jochen Neuhaus; Nathanael Andrews; Carly Garrow; Johannes Kast; Christof M Sommer; Tobias Gehrig; Carsten N Gutt; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Whole-process nursing management for laparo-gastroscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Minxuan Wu; Hui Zhao; Lina Cao; Yufeng Ou; Ping Wang; Lingli Yang; Li Dong; Yiqun Zhang; Yaxing Shen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.