Literature DB >> 22936434

Technical and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position.

Ross F Goldberg1, Steven P Bowers, Michael Parker, John A Stauffer, Horacio J Asbun, C Daniel Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is performed through various approaches, including using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal esophageal dissection. The prone technique allows for gravity-aided retraction of the lung. The aim of this study was to examine perioperative outcomes after prone MIE in relation to patient preoperative comorbidities.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from our single tertiary-care center is presented. Between January 2007 and August 2010, a total of 42 patients underwent three-field prone MIE. The majority of patients were male (37 vs. 5 female), with an average age of 68 years (range = 37-87). The diagnoses for patients who underwent MIE were 35 adenocarcinoma, four Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia, two achalasia, and one squamous cell carcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy was administered to 16 (38 %) patients. Preoperative comorbidities were quantified using the Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index; low risk was defined as a score of 0-2 (23 patients), moderate risk 3-4 (14 patients), and high risk 5 or higher (five patients). Postoperative complications were stratified using the Clavien Classification Scale; minor complications were grades 1 and 2 and major complications were grades 3-5.
RESULTS: Median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range = 6-51) and median ICU stay was 2 days (range = 1-26). Average prone surgical time was 108 min (range = 67-198). Thirty-seven of 42 patients (88 %) were extubated on the day of operation. Postoperatively, all five high-risk patients had a complication, three of which were major. Eight of the 14 moderate-risk patients had a complication and three were major, and 17 of the 23 low-risk group had a complication with nine being major. There was a total of 15 major complications. Predominant complications were arrhythmias (15) and pneumonia (five), with four anastomotic leaks and two postoperative 30-day mortalities.
CONCLUSIONS: This series supports using prone MIE. Despite a clinical pathway, including immediate extubation postoperatively, there is still a risk of pulmonary complications that appears to correlate with higher preoperative comorbidity scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22936434     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2479-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions.

Authors:  Thomas Fabian; Jeremiah Martin; Mario Katigbak; Alicia A McKelvey; John A Federico
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  New developments in esophageal surgery.

Authors:  C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-01

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Fabian; A A McKelvey; M S Kent; J A Federico
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Hironori Iwasaki; Kiitiro Kobayashi; Akihiko Uchiyama; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Toshihiro Masatsugu; Kenta Koike; Kouji Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors.

Authors:  Alain Sauvanet; Christophe Mariette; Pascal Thomas; Patrick Lozac'h; Philippe Segol; Emmanuel Tiret; Jean-Robert Delpero; Denis Collet; Joël Leborgne; Bernard Pradère; André Bourgeon; Jean-Pierre Triboulet
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Dapri; J Himpens; G B Cadière
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with operated primary non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  O Birim; A P W M Maat; A P Kappetein; J P van Meerbeeck; R A M Damhuis; A J J C Bogers
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 9.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  H Bartels; H J Stein; J R Siewert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  6 in total

1.  Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the upper mediastinum.

Authors:  Sylvia van der Horst; Teun Johannes Weijs; Jelle Pieter Ruurda; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Stella Mook; Lodewijk Adriaan Anton Brosens; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Palliative fenestration for a symptomatic subcarinal bronchogenic cyst by the prone position approach.

Authors:  Toru Nakamura; Ryo Fujikawa; Yoshifumi Arai; Yoshiro Otsuki; Kazuhito Funai
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-28

3.  Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer - benefits and controversies.

Authors:  Grzegorz Wallner; Witold Zgodziński; Wioletta Masiak-Segit; Tomasz Skoczylas; Andrzej Dąbrowski
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2014-06-29

4.  Internal and External Validation of a multivariable Model to Define Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Maarten F J Seesing; Peter S N van Rossum; Marijn Koëter; Pieter C van der Sluis; Misha D P Luyer; Jelle P Ruurda; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Learning curve associated with thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients in the prone position.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Mu-Yuan Ma; Bo Wu; Yang Zhao; Xiao-Feng Ye; Tao Li
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Comparative study of three types of lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shuangping Zhang; Peng Zhang; Shiping Guo; Jianhong Lian; Yun Chen; Ailan Chen; Yong Ma; Feng Li
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.