Literature DB >> 10690384

Assessment of hospitalised cancer patients' needs by the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire.

M Tamburini1, L Gangeri, C Brunelli, E Beltrami, P Boeri, C Borreani, C Fusco Karmann, M Greco, G Miccinesi, L Murru, P Trimigno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer disease modifies the order and the nature of needs connected with the state of health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the informative, psychological, social and practical needs of hospitalised cancer patients by means of the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ), an instrument designed concisely for the convenience of patients and medical staff. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Different samples of consecutive hospitalised cancer patients were involved in the various phases of designing the instrument: 30 patients for items identification, 101 patients for completeness and acceptability evaluation, 423 patients for construct validity and prevalence of needs; content and reliability analysis were performed on 2 subsamples of, respectively, 60 and 88 of the patients from the last sample.
RESULTS: The validation analysis showed rather good reliability, structure validity and internal consistency of the questionnaire. The prevalence analysis showed that the most common needs were: 'more information about my future conditions' (74%); 'more information about my diagnosis' (56%); 'more information about the exams I am undergoing' (52%); 'more explanations on treatments' (51%); 'to have a better dialogue with clinicians' (57%); 'better services from the hospital' (bathrooms, meals, cleaning) (56%).
CONCLUSIONS: The NEQ, self-completed by patients, has proven to be a useful clinical tool for obtaining a systematic and undistorted overview of the principal needs with respect to the state of health of patients. This instrument, which can also be administered by persons not belonging to the health care system such as volunteers, and inserted into the patients' hospital charts, could be used by the medical staff to identify the real needs of patients at an early stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10690384     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008396930832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  36 in total

1.  Gender-related needs and preferences in cancer care indicate the need for an individualized approach to cancer patients.

Authors:  Hester Wessels; Alexander de Graeff; Klaske Wynia; Miriam de Heus; Cas L J J Kruitwagen; Gerda T G J Woltjer; Saskia C C M Teunissen; Emile E Voest
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-05-27

2.  Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Shim; Kyung-Sook Lee; Jong-Hyock Park; Jae-Hyun Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The Supportive Care Task Force at the University of L'Aquila: 2-years experience.

Authors:  Giampiero Porzio; Enrico Ricevuto; Federica Aielli; Lucilla Verna; Katia Cannita; Rocco Pollice; Paolo Aloisi; Claudio Porto; Paolo Marchetti; Corrado Ficorella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Palliative care symptom assessment for patients with cancer in the emergency department: validation of the Screen for Palliative and End-of-life care needs in the Emergency Department instrument.

Authors:  Christopher T Richards; Michael A Gisondi; Chih-Hung Chang; D Mark Courtney; Kirsten G Engel; Linda Emanuel; Tammie Quest
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 5.  Development of cancer needs questionnaire for parents and carers of adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  Mariko L Carey; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Robert William Sanson-Fisher; Anthony Shakeshaft
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Assessing the social impact of cancer: a review of available tools.

Authors:  Barbara Muzzatti; M Antonietta Annunziata
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Construct validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire information module.

Authors:  Susanne Singer; Philipp M Engelberg; Gregor Weißflog; Susanne Kuhnt; Jochen Ernst
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Association of goals of care meetings for hospitalized cancer patients at risk for critical care with patient outcomes.

Authors:  Colleen C Apostol; Julie M Waldfogel; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Donald List; Lynn S Billing; Suzanne A Nesbit; Sydney Morss Dy
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  Information and service needs for young adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Brad Zebrack
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review.

Authors:  James D Harrison; Jane M Young; Melanie A Price; Phyllis N Butow; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.