Colleen C Apostol1, Julie M Waldfogel2, Elizabeth R Pfoh3, Donald List4, Lynn S Billing5, Suzanne A Nesbit2, Sydney Morss Dy6. 1. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (SKCCC), Baltimore, MD, USA apostco@jhmi.edu. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Social Work, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (SKCCC), Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Harry J. Duffey Family Pain and Palliative Care Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (SKCCC), Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA Harry J. Duffey Family Pain and Palliative Care Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (SKCCC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Caring for cancer patients with advanced and refractory disease requires communication about care preferences, particularly when patients become ill enough to be at risk for critical care interventions potentially inconsistent with their preferences. AIM: To describe the use of goals of care discussions in patients with advanced/refractory cancer at risk for critical care interventions and evaluate associations between these discussions and outcomes. DESIGN: Cohort study describing patients/families' perceptions of goals of care meetings and comparing health care utilization outcomes of patients who did and did not have discussions. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Inpatient units of an academic cancer center. Included patients had metastatic solid tumors or relapsed/refractory lymphoma or leukemia and were at risk for critical care, defined as requiring supplemental oxygen and/or cardiac monitor. RESULTS: Of 86 patients enrolled, 34 (39%) had a reported goals of care discussion (study group). Patients/families reported their needs and goals were addressed moderately to quite a bit during the meetings. Patients in the study group were less likely to receive critical care (0% vs 22%, p = 0.003) and more likely to be discharged to hospice (48% vs 30%, p = 0.04) than the control group. Only one patient in the study group died during the index hospitalization (on comfort care) (3%) compared with 9(17%) in the control group (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Goals of care meetings for advanced/refractory cancer inpatients at risk for critical care interventions can address patient and family goals and needs and improve health care utilization. These meetings should be part of routine care for these patients.
BACKGROUND: Caring for cancerpatients with advanced and refractory disease requires communication about care preferences, particularly when patients become ill enough to be at risk for critical care interventions potentially inconsistent with their preferences. AIM: To describe the use of goals of care discussions in patients with advanced/refractory cancer at risk for critical care interventions and evaluate associations between these discussions and outcomes. DESIGN: Cohort study describing patients/families' perceptions of goals of care meetings and comparing health care utilization outcomes of patients who did and did not have discussions. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Inpatient units of an academic cancer center. Included patients had metastatic solid tumors or relapsed/refractory lymphoma or leukemia and were at risk for critical care, defined as requiring supplemental oxygen and/or cardiac monitor. RESULTS: Of 86 patients enrolled, 34 (39%) had a reported goals of care discussion (study group). Patients/families reported their needs and goals were addressed moderately to quite a bit during the meetings. Patients in the study group were less likely to receive critical care (0% vs 22%, p = 0.003) and more likely to be discharged to hospice (48% vs 30%, p = 0.04) than the control group. Only one patient in the study group died during the index hospitalization (on comfort care) (3%) compared with 9(17%) in the control group (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Goals of care meetings for advanced/refractory cancer inpatients at risk for critical care interventions can address patient and family goals and needs and improve health care utilization. These meetings should be part of routine care for these patients.
Authors: Marco Maltoni; Augusto Caraceni; Cinzia Brunelli; Bert Broeckaert; Nicholas Christakis; Steffen Eychmueller; Paul Glare; Maria Nabal; Antonio Viganò; Philip Larkin; Franco De Conno; Geoffrey Hanks; Stein Kaasa Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Renee D Stapleton; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Christopher H Goss; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Yu Jung Kim; Mi-Jung Kim; Young-Jae Cho; Jong Sun Park; Jin Won Kim; Hyun Chang; Jeong-Ok Lee; Keun-Wook Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Ho Il Yoon; Soo-Mee Bang; Jae Ho Lee; Choon-Taek Lee; Jong Seok Lee Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Sydney Morss Dy; Steven M Asch; Karl A Lorenz; Kristina Weeks; Rashmi K Sharma; Antonio C Wolff; Jennifer L Malin Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Oluwakemi A Fawole; Sydney M Dy; Renee F Wilson; Brandyn D Lau; Kathryn A Martinez; Colleen C Apostol; Daniela Vollenweider; Eric B Bass; Rebecca A Aslakson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Bobby Daly; Andrew Hantel; Kristen Wroblewski; Jay S Balachandran; Selina Chow; Rebecca DeBoer; Gini F Fleming; Olwen M Hahn; Justin Kline; Hongtao Liu; Bhakti K Patel; Anshu Verma; Leah J Witt; Mayumi Fukui; Aditi Kumar; Michael D Howell; Blase N Polite Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.840