Literature DB >> 10688391

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefepime administered by intermittent and continuous infusion.

D S Burgess1, R W Hastings, T C Hardin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefepime administered by intermittent and continuous infusion against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, and Staphylococcus aureus.
BACKGROUND: Because beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit time-dependent bactericidal activity and lack prolonged postantibiotic effects against many bacteria, the goal of therapy is to maintain serum drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the relevant pathogen over most of the dosing interval. Continuous infusion is a mode of drug administration that can provide serum drug concentrations continuously above the MIC for most bacterial pathogens.
METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled. Each received cefepime 2 g by intermittent bolus q12h and, on another day, was randomly assigned to receive 4 or 3 g administered by continuous infusion over 24 hours.
RESULTS: For the intermittent regimen, the mean (+/- SD) pharmacokinetic findings were: maximum serum concentration, 112.9 +/- 21.1 microg/mL; minimum serum concentration, 1.3 +/- 0.5 microg/mL; and half-life, 2.6 +/- 0.4 hours. For the 3- and 4-g continuous infusion regimens, steady-state serum concentrations (C(SS)) were 13.9 +/- 3.8 and 20.3 +/- 3.3 microg/mL, respectively. MICs ranged from 2 to 4, 0.125 to 8, and 2 to 8 microg/mL against P. aeruginosa, E. cloacae, and S. aureus, respectively. For the intermittent regimen, serum inhibitory titers (SITs) at 24 hours were > or = 1:2 in 46% of subjects against P. aeruginosa, 48% against E. cloacae, and 2% against S. aureus. For both continuous infusion regimens, SITs for each organism were > or = 1:2 in all subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: The intermittent regimen maintained serum concentrations above the MIC for P. aeruginosa and E. cloacae in > or = 92% (11/12) of subjects for > or = 70% of the dosing interval, provided the MIC was < or = 4 microg/mL. Both continuous infusion regimens provided a C(SS) above the MIC for all organisms. However, the C(SS) was > or = 4 times the MIC only if the MIC was < or = 2 microg/mL. Only the 4-g regimen provided such concentrations against isolates with an MIC of 4 microg/mL, and neither regimen provided such concentrations when the MIC was 8 microg/mL. These findings should be applied in comparative clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10688391     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)87978-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  17 in total

1.  Novel daptomycin combinations against daptomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Molly E Steed; Celine Vidaillac; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Randomized, open-label, comparative study of piperacillin-tazobactam administered by continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion for treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  William K Lau; David Mercer; Kamal M Itani; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti; Debra Mansfield; Adrian Dana
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamics of cefepime alone and in combination with various antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

Authors:  Vanthida Huang; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibacterials with time-dependent action: a systematic review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Sofia K Kasiakou; Kenneth R Lawrence; Nicolaos Choulis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Simultaneous determination of 12 beta-lactam antibiotics in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection: application to therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Marie-Clémence Verdier; Olivier Tribut; Pierre Tattevin; Yves Le Tulzo; Christian Michelet; Danièle Bentué-Ferrer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cefepime dosing in the morbidly obese patient population.

Authors:  Barrie S Rich; Rebecca Keel; Vanessa P Ho; Harma Turbendian; Cheguevara I Afaneh; Gregory F Dakin; Alfons Pomp; David P Nicolau; Philip S Barie
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  In vivo pharmacodynamics of new-generation β-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) in combination with cefepime against serine-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Kamilia Abdelraouf; Safa Almarzoky Abuhussain; David P Nicolau
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose, prolonged-infusion cefepime in adult critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Anthony M Nicasio; Robert E Ariano; Sheryl A Zelenitsky; Aryun Kim; Jared L Crandon; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Prospective monitoring of cefepime in intensive care unit adult patients.

Authors:  Thomas M Chapuis; Eric Giannoni; Paul A Majcherczyk; René Chioléro; Marie-Denise Schaller; Mette M Berger; Saskia Bolay; Laurent A Décosterd; Denis Bugnon; Philippe Moreillon
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Selecting antibacterials for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy : pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Richard S Slavik; Peter J Jewesson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.