Literature DB >> 10688024

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in the pediatric population.

B D Hamilton1, J M Gatti, P C Cartwright, B W Snow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic renal surgery has become an accepted approach for benign disease in adults. We compare our experience with laparoscopic and open nephrectomy in a pediatric population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 pediatric patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy and an additional 10 consecutive children underwent similar open procedures. All patients had benign disease and were treated at a single institution. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively for relevant clinical data.
RESULTS: Planned surgery was completed in all cases. There were no conversions to open surgery in the laparoscopic group. Mean operative time was 175.6 versus 120.2 minutes (p = 0.01) and mean hospital stay was 22.5 versus 41.3 hours (p = 0.03) in the laparoscopic and open nephrectomy groups, respectively. Blood loss was not statistically different. Analgesic use was qualitatively less in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy may be performed safely in children. While operative time was somewhat longer in our initial laparoscopic series, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter than for open surgery. Further experience with this technique is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10688024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopy in pediatric urology.

Authors:  J I Telsey; A A Caldamone
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  B Jaffray
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for nephrectomy in children: Anesthetic implications.

Authors:  Neerja Bhardwaj
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

4.  Laparoendoscopic single-site urologic surgery in children less than 5 years of age.

Authors:  Arvind Ganpule; Chetan Sheladiya; Shashikant Mishra; Ravindra Sabnis; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-08-07

5.  Minimally invasive partial or total nephrectomy in children: a comparison between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.

Authors:  R Pearce; R Subramaniam
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 6.  [The position of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology].

Authors:  D Teber; S Subotic; M Schulze; C Stock; S Eskicorapci; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Persistent post-transplant polyuria managed by bilateral native-kidney laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors:  Dragan Kravarusic; David L Sigalet; Lorraine A Hamiwka; Julian P Midgley; Andrew W Wade; Silviu Grisaru
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  An initial experience of 100 paediatric laparoscopic nephrectomies with transperitoneal or posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic approach.

Authors:  Mohan S Gundeti; Yatin Patel; Patrick G Duffy; Peter M Cuckow; Duncan T Wilcox; Imran Mushtaq
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Current trends in pediatric minimally invasive urologic surgery.

Authors:  Dennis J Lee; Philip H Kim; Chester J Koh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-02-18

10.  Pediatric transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison with an age-matched group undergoing open surgery.

Authors:  Boris Chertin; Jacob Ben-Chaim; Ezekiel H Landau; Dmitry Koulikov; Andrei Nadu; Petachia Reissman; Amicur Farkas; Yoram Mor
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.