Literature DB >> 17899132

Pediatric transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison with an age-matched group undergoing open surgery.

Boris Chertin1, Jacob Ben-Chaim, Ezekiel H Landau, Dmitry Koulikov, Andrei Nadu, Petachia Reissman, Amicur Farkas, Yoram Mor.   

Abstract

We have retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of laparoscopic transperitoneal partial nephrectomy (LTPN) in children in comparison to an age-matched group of children who underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in terms of safety, operative time, narcotic requirements and the length of hospitalization. All patients were divided into two groups. The first group of 10 children with a mean age of 3.6 +/- 1.3 years (mean +/- SEM) who underwent LTPN compared with an age and gender matched second group of 10 children with a mean age of 3.9 +/- 1.4 years who underwent OPN (P = 0.9119). In the first group, 5 upper poles and 5 lower poles partial nephrectomies were performed while in the second group 6 upper moieties and 4 lower moieties partial nephrectomies were performed, respectively. There was a single complication in each group. Intraoperative injury to the unaffected ureter was recognized during LTPN and required conversion to the open surgery in the beginning of learning curve and persistent urinary leakage from collecting system of the remnant pole in the OPN group, which resolved spontaneously. There was no difference in length of surgery and the intraoperative narcotic requirements (P = 0.8182, 0.7638, respectively). However, postoperative narcotic requirements were significantly lower in the first group 0.56 +/- 0.29 mg/kg compared to the second group 2.13 +/- 0.3 mg/kg, P = 0.0019. LTPN patients had significantly shorter hospitalization 2.7 +/- 0.29 days compared with the OPN group 5.1 +/- 0.64 days, P = 0.0039. Similar findings were also found in the subgroup of patients younger than 2 years. Median follow up in each group was 28 and 36 months, respectively. Our data show that LTPN is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure at every age. It has an equivalent operative time, shorter hospitalization and lower postoperative narcotic requirements compared to the open approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899132     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-007-2005-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  12 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic and robotic approach to genitourinary anomalies in children.

Authors:  Craig A Peters
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  B D Hamilton; J M Gatti; P C Cartwright; B W Snow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Pediatric retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison with an age matched cohort of open surgery.

Authors:  Richard S Lee; Alan B Retik; Joseph G Borer; David A Diamond; Craig A Peters
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for duplication anomalies in children.

Authors:  Lisandro Piaggio; Julie Franc-Guimond; T Ernesto Figueroa; Julia S Barthold; Ricardo González
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic heminephrectomy--what approach for which patient?

Authors:  M Castellan; R Gosalbez; A J Carmack; J C Prieto; M Perez-Brayfield; A Labbie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Laparoendoscopic upper pole partial nephrectomy with ureterectomy.

Authors:  G H Jordan; B H Winslow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in a pediatric series.

Authors:  Ben C Robinson; Brent W Snow; Patrick C Cartwright; Catherine R De Vries; Blake D Hamilton; Jeffrey B Anderson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Lower pole heminephrectomy: its role in treating nonfunctioning lower pole segments.

Authors:  Y Mor; P D Mouriquand; G F Quimby; P F Soonawalla; S Z Zaidi; P G Duffy; P G Ransley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open nephrectomy for benign renal diseases in children.

Authors:  Ja Hyeon Ku; Woon Geol Yeo; Hwang Choi; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic vs open partial nephroureterectomy in children.

Authors:  A El-Ghoneimi; W Farhat; S Bolduc; D Bagli; G McLorie; A Khoury
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy in pediatric population: A single-centre experience using a sealing device.

Authors:  Ibrahim Aydogdu; Mesrur Selcuk Silay
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Endoscopic laser-ablation for the treatment of orthotopic and ectopic ureteroceles in dogs: 13 cases (2008-2017).

Authors:  Cleo P Rogatko; Allyson C Berent; Larry G Adams; Chick W Weisse; Demetrius Bagley
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.333

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.