Literature DB >> 17571271

An initial experience of 100 paediatric laparoscopic nephrectomies with transperitoneal or posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic approach.

Mohan S Gundeti1, Yatin Patel, Patrick G Duffy, Peter M Cuckow, Duncan T Wilcox, Imran Mushtaq.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of the initial 100 consecutive laparoscopic nephrectomies using a transperitoneal or a posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic approach. The medical records of 97 consecutive children who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy between January 2000 and December 2003 were reviewed. Children having concomitant operative procedures were excluded from the study. Laparoscopy was performed by a transperitoneal (TP) or a posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic (PPR) approach based on the preference of the operating surgeon. A total of 100 procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. Two children required conversion to open surgery. The median operating time was 112 min for the TP approach and 96 min for the PPR approach (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the analgesic requirements between the two groups. The rate of complications was similar, as was the length of hospital stay. This was despite the fact that the children in the TP group were somewhat older in age. In children having bilateral native kidney nephrectomy, peritoneal dialysis was successfully established within 48 h after surgery in the PPR group. Taking into account the heterogeneous nature of our group of patients, a reliable conclusion in regard to the difference in operative time, analgesic requirement or approach could not be ascertained. There is the suggestion however, that both the TP and PPR approaches for nephrectomy are equally applicable in children. The posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic approach may have an advantage in children who require peritoneal dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17571271     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-007-1941-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Laparoscopic nephrectomy in children: the transperitoneal vs the retroperitoneal approach].

Authors:  María Fernanda Lorenzo Gómez; Ricardo González
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 0.436

2.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy is feasible in the first year of life and is not affected by kidney size.

Authors:  N K Jesch; M L Metzelder; J F Kuebler; B M Ure
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  B D Hamilton; J M Gatti; P C Cartwright; B W Snow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Complications of pediatric urological laparoscopy: mistakes and risks.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Mario Lima; Girolamo Mattioli; Luciano Mastroianni; Antonella Centonze; Gian Luca Monguzzi; Leonardo Montinaro; Giovanna Riccipetitoni; Alfredo Garzi; Antonio Savanelli; Rocco Damiano; Mario Messina; Alessandro Settimi; Giuseppe Amici; Vincenzo Jasonni; Lane S Palmer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Multi-institutional study of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures.

Authors:  M Soulié; L Salomon; P Seguin; C Mervant; P Mouly; A Hoznek; P Antiphon; P Plante; C C Abbou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy with simultaneous peritoneal dialysis: a new era.

Authors:  Caroline Booth; Imran Mushtaq; Susan Rigden
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Selective approach for transperitoneal and extraperitoneal endoscopic nephrectomy in children.

Authors:  P A Borzi; C K Yeung
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The single instrument port laparoscopic (SIMPL) nephrectomy.

Authors:  S Garg; M Gundeti; I Mushtaq
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for end-stage reflux nephropathy in a child.

Authors:  S Das; J J Keizur; M Tashima
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-12

10.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic vs open partial nephroureterectomy in children.

Authors:  A El-Ghoneimi; W Farhat; S Bolduc; D Bagli; G McLorie; A Khoury
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopy or retroperitoneoscopy: which is the best approach in pediatric urology?

Authors:  Dimitrios Antoniou; Christos Karetsos
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10

2.  Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for nephrectomy in children: Anesthetic implications.

Authors:  Neerja Bhardwaj
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

3.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy in pediatric population: A single-centre experience using a sealing device.

Authors:  Ibrahim Aydogdu; Mesrur Selcuk Silay
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in children with duplex kidney: A case report.

Authors:  Di-Xiang Chen; Zi-Hao Wang; Shan-Jie Wang; Yue-Yue Zhu; Nan Li; Xian-Qiang Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.