Literature DB >> 10686321

Responses of aquatic communities to 25-6 alcohol ethoxylate in model stream ecosystems.

.   

Abstract

A model stream ecosystem evaluation of the non-commercial alcohol ethoxylate 25-6 alcohol ethoxylate (AE) was performed in 1994. Algal, heterotrophic microbial, protozoan, and invertebrate communities were assessed over an 8-week exposure period that followed an 8-week colonization period. Streams were exposed to nominal concentrations of 0, 12, 37, 111, 333 and 1000 µg AE/l. Confirmed concentrations (8-week means) were 7 (at the detection limit), 13, 36, 76, 259, and 760 µg AE/l as measured at the head of streams on a weekly basis. Microbial communities were initially enhanced by AE exposure (first 2 weeks of exposure), but by the conclusion of the study autotrophic and heterotrophic microbial communities were similar across treatments. In contrast, invertebrate populations and communities responded strongly to AE exposure with adverse effects indicated at 259-760 µg/l by 4 weeks and at 36-760 µg/l by 8 weeks. Key affected groups were the sensitive mayfly, stonefly, and caddisfly fauna. Species richness and abundance of selected populations such as Stenonema (mayfly), Chimarra (caddisfly), and Corbicula (Asiatic clam) were affected. These data indicated a model ecosystem no-observed effect concentration of 13 µg/l for 25-6 AE. In contrast to other published AE model ecosystem studies, 25-6 appears more toxic. Structure-activity-relationships at the model ecosystem level still demonstrate good relationships across a range of surfactants with calculated K(ow)s of 3-6. Importantly, the collective information on fate and effects measured in laboratory and field systems confirms low risk to the environment.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10686321     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-445x(99)00048-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  4 in total

1.  Identification of a new type of ecological hazard of chemicals: inhibition of processes of ecological remediation.

Authors:  S A Ostroumov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

2.  Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in North America.

Authors:  Christina Cowan-Ellsberry; Scott Belanger; Philip Dorn; Scott Dyer; Drew McAvoy; Hans Sanderson; Donald Versteeg; Darci Ferrer; Kathleen Stanton
Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 12.561

3.  Exploring the Effects of Different Types of Surfactants on Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae.

Authors:  Yanan Wang; Yuan Zhang; Xu Li; Mingzhu Sun; Zhuo Wei; Yu Wang; Aiai Gao; Dongyan Chen; Xin Zhao; Xizeng Feng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Functional measures as potential indicators of down-the-drain chemical stress in freshwater ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Laura J Harrison; Katie A Pearson; Christopher J Wheatley; Jane K Hill; Lorraine Maltby; Claudia Rivetti; Lucy Speirs; Piran C L White
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.084

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.