| Literature DB >> 12356956 |
Abstract
The widespread abandonment of frozen embryos by the gamete providers or intentional parents urgently demands a solution. Most centres react by requiring patients to enter a prior agreement governing the future disposition of their embryos in all foreseeable circumstances. These dispositional directives are inappropriate and self defeating in the event of contingencies in which the patients remain competent to execute an updated directive. Internal and external changes may invalidate the prior directive by altering the situation as represented by the couple at the initiation of treatment to such an extent that it no longer corresponds with the actual situation at the time of the execution of the disposition. The prior agreement should only be considered binding if the agreement among the partners on a specific option was a material condition for one of the partners to start treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Genetics and Reproduction
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12356956 PMCID: PMC1733654 DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.5.295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903