Literature DB >> 12356956

The validity of contracts to dispose of frozen embryos.

G Pennings1.   

Abstract

The widespread abandonment of frozen embryos by the gamete providers or intentional parents urgently demands a solution. Most centres react by requiring patients to enter a prior agreement governing the future disposition of their embryos in all foreseeable circumstances. These dispositional directives are inappropriate and self defeating in the event of contingencies in which the patients remain competent to execute an updated directive. Internal and external changes may invalidate the prior directive by altering the situation as represented by the couple at the initiation of treatment to such an extent that it no longer corresponds with the actual situation at the time of the execution of the disposition. The prior agreement should only be considered binding if the agreement among the partners on a specific option was a material condition for one of the partners to start treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356956      PMCID: PMC1733654          DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.5.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  10 in total

1.  Disposition of frozen embryos by divorcing couples without prior agreement.

Authors:  J A Robertson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Assisted reproductive technologies and the pregnancy process: developing an equality model to protect reproductive liberties.

Authors:  J F Daar
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1999

3.  Ulysses and the fate of frozen embryos--reproduction, research, or destruction?

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The disposition of unused frozen embryos.

Authors:  S C Klock; S Sheinin; R R Kazer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Precedent autonomy and personal identity.

Authors:  Michael Quante
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1999-12

6.  Resolving disputes over frozen embryos.

Authors:  J A Robertson
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Embryo donation programs and policies in North America: survey results and implications for health and mental health professionals.

Authors:  S A Kingsberg; L D Applegarth; J W Janata
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Appropriate and inappropriate use of advance directives.

Authors:  L Emanuel
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1994

9.  The destiny of supernumerary embryos?

Authors:  S Cooper
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Advance directives, dementia, and 'the someone else problem'

Authors:  David DeGrazia
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.898

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Sterilisation of young, competent, and childless adults.

Authors:  Piers Benn; Martin Lupton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-04

2.  Dual consent? Donors' and recipients' views about involvement in decision-making on the use of embryos created by gamete donation in research.

Authors:  I Baía; C de Freitas; C Samorinha; V Provoost; S Silva
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.