Literature DB >> 10679159

DNA archives and our nearest relative: the trichotomy problem revisited.

Y Satta1, J Klein, N Takahata.   

Abstract

Ever since Thomas H. Huxley correctly identified the chimpanzee and the gorilla as the two closest relatives of the human, the problem of the relationship among the three species ("the trichotomy problem") has remained unresolved. Comparative morphology and other classical methods of biological investigation have failed to answer definitively whether the chimpanzee or the gorilla is the closest relative of the human species. DNA sequences, both mitochondrial and nuclear, too, have provided equivocal solutions, depending on the region of the genome analyzed. Random sorting of ancestral allelic lineages, sequence convergence, and sequence exchanges between alleles or duplicated loci have been identified as likely factors confounding the interpretation of the interrelationships among the three species. In the present study most of these difficulties are overcome by identifying evolutionary causes that might potentially provide misleading information. Altogether, 45 loci consisting of 46, 855 bp are analyzed. About 60% of the loci and approximately the same proportion of phylogenetically informative sites support the human-chimpanzee clade. The remaining 40% of loci and sites support the two alternatives equally. It is demonstrated that, while incompatibility between loci can be explained by random sorting of allelic lineages, incompatibility within loci must be attributed largely to the joint effect of recombination and genetic drift. The trichotomy problem can be properly addressed only within this framework. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10679159     DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  25 in total

1.  Direct evidence for the Homo-Pan clade.

Authors:  Rainer Wimmer; Stefan Kirsch; Gudrun A Rappold; Werner Schempp
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Great ape genomics.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

3.  Phylogenetic incongruence among oncogenic genital alpha human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  Apurva Narechania; Zigui Chen; Rob DeSalle; Robert D Burk
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Inferring Human Demographic Histories of Non-African Populations from Patterns of Allele Sharing.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  More accurate phylogenies inferred from low-recombination regions in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting.

Authors:  James B Pease; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.

Authors:  Alex Wong; Jeffrey D Jensen; John E Pool; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Large differences between LINE-1 amplification rates in the human and chimpanzee lineages.

Authors:  Lauren M Mathews; Susan Y Chi; Noam Greenberg; Igor Ovchinnikov; Gary D Swergold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Morphometrics and hominoid phylogeny: Support for a chimpanzee-human clade and differentiation among great ape subspecies.

Authors:  Charles A Lockwood; William H Kimbel; John M Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Alu elements and hominid phylogenetics.

Authors:  Abdel-Halim Salem; David A Ray; Jinchuan Xing; Pauline A Callinan; Jeremy S Myers; Dale J Hedges; Randall K Garber; David J Witherspoon; Lynn B Jorde; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Fine-scale phylogenetic discordance across the house mouse genome.

Authors:  Michael A White; Cécile Ané; Colin N Dewey; Bret R Larget; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.