Literature DB >> 10677318

Removing the sampling restrictions from family-based tests of association for a quantitative-trait locus.

S A Monks1, N L Kaplan.   

Abstract

One strategy for localization of a quantitative-trait locus (QTL) is to test whether the distribution of a quantitative trait depends on the number of copies of a specific genetic-marker allele that an individual possesses. This approach tests for association between alleles at the marker and the QTL, and it assumes that association is a consequence of the marker being physically close to the QTL. However, problems can occur when data are not from a homogeneous population, since associations can arise irrespective of a genetic marker being in physical proximity to the QTL-that is, no information is gained regarding localization. Methods to address this problem have recently been proposed. These proposed methods use family data for indirect stratification of a population, thereby removing the effect of associations that are due to unknown population substructure. They are, however, restricted in terms of the number of children per family that can be used in the analysis. Here we introduce tests that can be used on family data with parent and child genotypes, with child genotypes only, or with a combination of these types of families, without size restrictions. Furthermore, equations that allow one to determine the sample size needed to achieve desired power are derived. By means of simulation, we demonstrate that the existing tests have an elevated false-positive rate when the size restrictions are not followed and that a good deal of information is lost as a result of adherence to the size restrictions. Finally, we introduce permutation procedures that are recommended for small samples but that can also be used for extensions of the tests to multiallelic markers and to the simultaneous use of more than one marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10677318      PMCID: PMC1288111          DOI: 10.1086/302745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  19 in total

1.  Quantitative trait transmission disequilibrium test: allowance for missing parents.

Authors:  D J Schaid; C M Rowland
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Sibling-based tests of linkage and association for quantitative traits.

Authors:  D B Allison; M Heo; N Kaplan; E R Martin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families.

Authors:  E R Martin; N L Kaplan; B S Weir
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease.

Authors:  D J Schaid; C Rowland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A comparative study of sibship tests of linkage and/or association.

Authors:  S A Monks; N L Kaplan; B S Weir
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A conditional inference framework for extending the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  L C Lazzeroni; K Lange
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  Genetic association mapping based on discordant sib pairs: the discordant-alleles test.

Authors:  M Boehnke; C D Langefeld
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  D Rabinowitz
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  Use of siblings as controls in case-control association studies.

Authors:  D Curtis
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data.

Authors:  S Horvath; N M Laird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  32 in total

1.  A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: the pedigree disequilibrium test.

Authors:  E R Martin; S A Monks; L L Warren; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Quantitative similarity-based association tests using population samples.

Authors:  S Zhang; H Zhao
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-30       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.

Authors:  G R Abecasis; W O Cookson; L R Cardon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Power and design considerations for a general class of family-based association tests: quantitative traits.

Authors:  Christoph Lange; Dawn L DeMeo; Nan M Laird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  PBAT: tools for family-based association studies.

Authors:  Christoph Lange; Dawn DeMeo; Edwin K Silverman; Scott T Weiss; Nan M Laird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Transmission/disequilibrium test based on haplotype sharing for tightly linked markers.

Authors:  Shuanglin Zhang; Qiuying Sha; Huann-Sheng Chen; Jianping Dong; Renfang Jiang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  Statistical equivalent of the classical TDT for quantitative traits and multivariate phenotypes.

Authors:  Tanushree Haldar; Saurabh Ghosh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  A new test for family-based association mapping with inbred lines from plant breeding programs.

Authors:  Benjamin Stich; Albrecht E Melchinger; Hans-Peter Piepho; Martin Heckenberger; Hans P Maurer; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 9.  Review and evaluation of methods correcting for population stratification with a focus on underlying statistical principles.

Authors:  Hemant K Tiwari; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Nathan Wineinger; Miguel A Padilla; Laura K Vaughan; David B Allison
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 10.  Family-based association mapping in crop species.

Authors:  Baohong Guo; Daolong Wang; Zhigang Guo; William D Beavis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.