Literature DB >> 10825280

A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: the pedigree disequilibrium test.

E R Martin1, S A Monks, L L Warren, N L Kaplan.   

Abstract

Family-based tests of linkage disequilibrium typically are based on nuclear-family data including affected individuals and their parents or their unaffected siblings. A limitation of such tests is that they generally are not valid tests of association when data from related nuclear families from larger pedigrees are used. Standard methods require selection of a single nuclear family from any extended pedigrees when testing for linkage disequilibrium. Often data are available for larger pedigrees, and it would be desirable to have a valid test of linkage disequilibrium that can use all potentially informative data. In this study, we present the pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) for analysis of linkage disequilibrium in general pedigrees. The PDT can use data from related nuclear families from extended pedigrees and is valid even when there is population substructure. Using computer simulations, we demonstrated validity of the test when the asymptotic distribution is used to assess the significance, and examined statistical power. Power simulations demonstrate that, when extended pedigree data are available, substantial gains in power can be attained by use of the PDT rather than existing methods that use only a subset of the data. Furthermore, the PDT remains more powerful even when there is misclassification of unaffected individuals. Our simulations suggest that there may be advantages to using the PDT even if the data consist of independent families without extended family information. Thus, the PDT provides a general test of linkage disequilibrium that can be widely applied to different data structures.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10825280      PMCID: PMC1287073          DOI: 10.1086/302957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  11 in total

1.  The transmission/disequilibrium test and parental-genotype reconstruction: the reconstruction-combined transmission/ disequilibrium test.

Authors:  M Knapp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families.

Authors:  E R Martin; N L Kaplan; B S Weir
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A comparative study of sibship tests of linkage and/or association.

Authors:  S A Monks; N L Kaplan; B S Weir
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genetic association mapping based on discordant sib pairs: the discordant-alleles test.

Authors:  M Boehnke; C D Langefeld
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  R S Spielman; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association.

Authors:  R S Spielman; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A note on the application of the transmission disequilibrium test when a parent is missing.

Authors:  D Curtis; P C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Use of siblings as controls in case-control association studies.

Authors:  D Curtis
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Removing the sampling restrictions from family-based tests of association for a quantitative-trait locus.

Authors:  S A Monks; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).

Authors:  R S Spielman; R E McGinnis; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  222 in total

1.  Correcting for a potential bias in the pedigree disequilibrium test.

Authors:  E R Martin; M P Bass; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Multipoint linkage-disequilibrium-mapping approach based on the case-parent trio design.

Authors:  K Y Liang; F C Hsu; T H Beaty; K C Barnes
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 18 control variation in levels of T and B lymphocyte subpopulations.

Authors:  M A Hall; P J Norman; B Thiel; H Tiwari; A Peiffer; R W Vaughan; S Prescott; M Leppert; N J Schork; J S Lanchbury
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.

Authors:  G R Abecasis; W O Cookson; L R Cardon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Increasing the power and efficiency of disease-marker case-control association studies through use of allele-sharing information.

Authors:  Tasha E Fingerlin; Michael Boehnke; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  The International Psoriasis Genetics Study: assessing linkage to 14 candidate susceptibility loci in a cohort of 942 affected sib pairs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Accounting for linkage in family-based tests of association with missing parental genotypes.

Authors:  Eden R Martin; Meredyth P Bass; Elizabeth R Hauser; Norman L Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A comparison of popular TDT-generalizations for family-based association analysis.

Authors:  Julian Hecker; Nan Laird; Christoph Lange
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Genetic association analyses of nitric oxide synthase genes and neural tube defects vary by phenotype.

Authors:  Karen L Soldano; Melanie E Garrett; Heidi L Cope; J Michael Rusnak; Nathen J Ellis; Kaitlyn L Dunlap; Marcy C Speer; Simon G Gregory; Allison E Ashley-Koch
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-09

10.  Association of synapsin 2 with schizophrenia in families of Northern European ancestry.

Authors:  Viatcheslav Saviouk; Michael P Moreau; Irina V Tereshchenko; Linda M Brzustowicz
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.