Literature DB >> 10668649

Cross-modal generalization effects of training noncanonical sentence comprehension and production in agrammatic aphasia.

B J Jacobs1, C K Thompson.   

Abstract

The cross-modal generalization effects of training complex sentence comprehension and complex sentence production were examined in 4 individuals with agrammatic Broca's aphasia who showed difficulty comprehending and producing complex, noncanonical sentences. Object-cleft and passive sentences were selected for treatment because the two are linguistically distinct, relying on wh-and NP movement, respectively (Chomsky, 1986). Two participants received comprehension training, and 2 received production training using linguistic specific treatment (LST). LST takes participants through a series of steps that emphasize the verb and verb argument structure, as well as the linguistic movement required to derive target sentences. A single-subject multiple-baseline design across behaviors was used to measure acquisition and generalization within and across sentence types, as well as cross-modal generalization (i.e., from comprehension to production and vice versa) and generalization to discourse. Results indicated that both treatment methods were effective for training comprehension and production of target sentences and that comprehension treatment resulted in generalization to spoken and written sentence production. Sentence production treatment generalized to written sentence production only; generalization to comprehension did not occur. Across sentence types generalization also did not occur, as predicted, and the effects of treatment on discourse were inconsistent across participants. These data are discussed with regard to models of normal sentence comprehension and production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10668649      PMCID: PMC3025283          DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4301.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  23 in total

1.  The disruption of sentence production: some dissociations.

Authors:  A Caramazza; A E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Building the foundations for sentence production in a non-fluent aphasic.

Authors:  E V Jones
Journal:  Br J Disord Commun       Date:  1986-04

3.  Wh interrogative production in agrammatic aphasia: an experimental analysis of auditory-visual stimulation and direct-production treatment.

Authors:  C K Thompson; L V McReynolds
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-06

4.  Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part II: Design selection and arrangement of experimental phases.

Authors:  K P Kearns
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1986-08

5.  Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part III: Using flexibility to design or modify experiments.

Authors:  P J Connell; C K Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1986-08

6.  Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient.

Authors:  D Caplan; C Futter
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics.

Authors:  M C Linebarger; M F Schwartz; E M Saffran
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-05

8.  On the preservation of word order in aphasia: cross-linguistic evidence.

Authors:  E A Bates; A D Friederici; B B Wulfeck; L A Juarez
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder.

Authors:  G Miceli; A Mazzucchi; L Menn; H Goodglass
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Syntactic loss versus processing deficit: an assessment of two theories of agrammatism and syntactic comprehension deficits.

Authors:  R C Martin; W F Wetzel; C Blossom-Stach; E Feher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-07
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: the science and the state of the science.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE).

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Lewis P Shapiro; Swathi Kiran; Jana Sobecks
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Sentactics®: Computer-Automated Treatment of Underlying Forms.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Jungwon Janet Choy; Audrey Holland; Ronald Cole
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.773

4.  Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS).

Authors:  Soojin Cho-Reyes; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Evaluating Treatment and Generalization Patterns of Two Theoretically Motivated Sentence Comprehension Therapies.

Authors:  Carrie A Des Roches; Sofia Vallila-Rohter; Sarah Villard; Yorghos Tripodis; David Caplan; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Experimental analysis of using examples and non-examples in safety training.

Authors:  Matthew A Taylor; Oliver Wirth; Marc Olvina; Alicia M Alvero
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2016-10-15

7.  Recovery of Online Sentence Processing in Aphasia: Eye Movement Changes Resulting From Treatment of Underlying Forms.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Elena Barbieri; Jennifer Mack; Brianne Chiappetta; Eduardo Europa; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Development of a theoretically based treatment for sentence comprehension deficits in individuals with aphasia.

Authors:  Swathi Kiran; David Caplan; Chaleece Sandberg; Joshua Levy; Alex Berardino; Elsa Ascenso; Sarah Villard; Yorghos Tripodis
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Neural plasticity and treatment-induced recovery of sentence processing in agrammatism.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Borna Bonakdarpour; Kyla Garibaldi; Todd B Parrish
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.