Literature DB >> 28474086

Recovery of Online Sentence Processing in Aphasia: Eye Movement Changes Resulting From Treatment of Underlying Forms.

Jennifer E Mack1, Cynthia K Thompson2.   

Abstract

Purpose: The present study tested whether (and how) language treatment changed online sentence processing in individuals with aphasia. Method: Participants with aphasia (n = 10) received a 12-week program of Treatment of Underlying Forms (Thompson & Shapiro, 2005) focused on production and comprehension of passive sentences. Before and after treatment, participants performed a sentence-picture matching task with active and passive sentences as eye movements were tracked. Twelve age-matched controls also performed the task once each.
Results: In the age-matched group, eye movements indicated agent-first predictive processing after hearing the subject noun, followed by rapid thematic reanalysis after hearing the verb form. Pretreatment eye movements in the participants with aphasia showed no predictive agent-first processing, and more accurate thematic analysis in active compared to passive sentences. After treatment, which resulted in improved offline passive sentence production and comprehension, participants were more likely to respond correctly when they made agent-first eye movements early in the sentence, showed equally reliable thematic analysis in active and passive sentences, and were less likely to use a spatially based alternative response strategy. Conclusions: These findings suggest that treatment focused on improving sentence production and comprehension supports the emergence of more normal-like sentence comprehension processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28474086      PMCID: PMC5755549          DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  41 in total

1.  The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE).

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Lewis P Shapiro; Swathi Kiran; Jana Sobecks
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Tracking Passive Sentence Comprehension in Agrammatic Aphasia.

Authors:  Aaron M Meyer; Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 1.710

4.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences.

Authors:  Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Syntactic and morphosyntactic processing in stroke-induced and primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Aya Meltzer-Asscher; Soojin Cho; Jiyeon Lee; Christina Wieneke; Sandra Weintraub; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.342

6.  Neural plasticity and treatment-induced recovery of sentence processing in agrammatism.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Borna Bonakdarpour; Kyla Garibaldi; Todd B Parrish
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Effects of verb meaning on lexical integration in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Woohyuk Ji; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.710

8.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: nature or culture?

Authors:  Anne Maass; Aurore Russo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-07

10.  What is the nature of poststroke language recovery and reorganization?

Authors:  Swathi Kiran
Journal:  ISRN Neurol       Date:  2012-12-23
View more
  6 in total

1.  Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Elena Barbieri; Jennifer Mack; Brianne Chiappetta; Eduardo Europa; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Verb-argument integration in primary progressive aphasia: Real-time argument access and selection.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; M-Marsel Mesulam; Emily J Rogalski; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Rajani Sebastian
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.618

4.  Plasticity of sentence processing networks: evidence from a patient with agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (PPA).

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Elena Barbieri; Jennifer E Mack; Aaron Wilkins; Kathy Y Xie
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 0.881

5.  Thematic Integration Impairments in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Matthew Walenski; Jennifer E Mack; M Marsel Mesulam; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Automation of the Northwestern Narrative Language Analysis System.

Authors:  Davida Fromm; Brian MacWhinney; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.