Literature DB >> 3525988

Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part III: Using flexibility to design or modify experiments.

P J Connell, C K Thompson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present clinical researchers with viable alternatives to basic, prototypical single-subject experimental designs. The availability of these alternatives is a product of the flexibility inherent in the application of these designs. Two general types of flexibility are discussed: a priori flexibility, as in combining designs in one study and ad hoc flexibility in which a design is modified during the course of a study. The flexibility afforded by the designs provides the opportunity to fashion individual experimental designs for specific research problems addressed. A review of the clinical research literature published during the last 10 years revealed that the flexibility of these designs has been underutilized. The benefits that can derive from using the potential flexibility of the designs are described, and specific suggestions are made for incorporating flexibility into clinical research.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3525988     DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5103.214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord        ISSN: 0022-4677


  11 in total

1.  Cross-modal generalization effects of training noncanonical sentence comprehension and production in agrammatic aphasia.

Authors:  B J Jacobs; C K Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: the science and the state of the science.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Typicality of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia treatment: further evidence for semantic complexity.

Authors:  Swathi Kiran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The influence of semantic class and argument structure properties on generalisation.

Authors:  Sandra L Schneider; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  A comparison of word lexicality in the treatment of speech sound disorders.

Authors:  Alycia E Cummings; Jessica A Barlow
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  A Priori Justification for Effect Measures in Single-Case Experimental Designs.

Authors:  Rumen Manolov; Mariola Moeyaert; Joelle E Fingerhut
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 7.  Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Breanne J Byiers; Joe Reichle; Frank J Symons
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on Lexical Retrieval of Content Words in Sentences in Persons with Aphasia.

Authors:  Lisa A Edmonds; Stephen E Nadeau; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.773

9.  Semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: evidence from well-defined categories.

Authors:  Swathi Kiran; Lauren Johnson
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality.

Authors:  Swathi Kiran; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.