Literature DB >> 10664755

What object attributes determine canonical views?

V Blanz1, M J Tarr, H H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

We investigated preferred or canonical views for familiar and three-dimensional nonsense objects using computer-graphics psychophysics. We assessed the canonical views for objects by allowing participants to actively rotate realistically shaded three-dimensional models in real-time. Objects were viewed on a Silicon Graphics workstation and manipulated in virtual space with a three-degree-of-freedom input device. In the first experiment, participants adjusted each object to the viewpoint from which they would take a photograph if they planned to use the object to illustrate a brochure. In the second experiment, participants mentally imaged each object on the basis of the name and then adjusted the object to the viewpoint from which they imagined it. In both experiments, there was a large degree of consistency across participants in terms of the preferred view for a given object. Our results provide new insights on the geometrical, experiential, and functional attributes that determine canonical views under ecological conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10664755     DOI: 10.1068/p2897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  23 in total

1.  Repetition suppression in occipitotemporal cortex despite negligible visual similarity: evidence for postperceptual processing?

Authors:  Aidan J Horner; Richard N Henson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  On the three-quarter view advantage of familiar object recognition.

Authors:  Kohei Nonose; Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-21

3.  Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: evidence from scene recognition.

Authors:  David Waller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

4.  Determining the orientation of depth-rotated familiar objects.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

5.  Three-quarter views are subjectively good because object orientation is uncertain.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

6.  Memory for objects in canonical and noncanonical viewpoints.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Jennifer Shutter; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

7.  For the mind's eye the world is two-dimensional.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Fred W Mast; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  The influence of stimulus duration on visual illusions and simple reaction time.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Ralph Weidner; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition.

Authors:  Tandra Ghose; Zili Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Some views are better than others: evidence for a visual bias in object views self-generated by toddlers.

Authors:  Karin H James; Susan S Jones; Shelley Swain; Alfredo Pereira; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.