OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether there is an excess of leukaemias in 0-15 year old children among those living in close proximity (within 100 m) of a main road or petrol station. METHODS: Data for 0-15 year old children diagnosed between 1990 and 1994 in the United Kingdom West Midlands were used. Postcode addresses were used to locate the point of residence which was compared with proximity to main roads and petrol stations separately, and to both together. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with solid tumours as a control, and incidence ratios (IRs) with population density as a control. RESULTS: The method based on solid tumours as a control showed ORs of 1.61 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.90 to 2.87) and 1.99 (95% CI 0.73 to 5.43), for those living within 100 m of a main road or petrol station respectively. When population was used as a control, the estimated IRs for leukaemia were 1.16 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.72) and 1.48 (95% CI 0.65 to 2.93) for residence within 100 m of a main road or petrol station respectively, but neither reached significance at the 95% level. Results for residence in close proximity to both a main road and petrol station were inconsistent, but there were few. The influence of socioeconomic factors as represented by the Townsend deprivation index on leukaemia incidence was not significant and the results were not explicable on the basis of impact of social class. CONCLUSIONS: The results are suggestive of a small increase in risk of childhood leukaemia, but not solid tumours, for those living in close proximity to a main road or petrol station. This increase in risk is not, however, significant and a larger study is warranted to establish the true risk and causes of any increase in risk.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether there is an excess of leukaemias in 0-15 year old children among those living in close proximity (within 100 m) of a main road or petrol station. METHODS: Data for 0-15 year old children diagnosed between 1990 and 1994 in the United Kingdom West Midlands were used. Postcode addresses were used to locate the point of residence which was compared with proximity to main roads and petrol stations separately, and to both together. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with solid tumours as a control, and incidence ratios (IRs) with population density as a control. RESULTS: The method based on solid tumours as a control showed ORs of 1.61 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.90 to 2.87) and 1.99 (95% CI 0.73 to 5.43), for those living within 100 m of a main road or petrol station respectively. When population was used as a control, the estimated IRs for leukaemia were 1.16 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.72) and 1.48 (95% CI 0.65 to 2.93) for residence within 100 m of a main road or petrol station respectively, but neither reached significance at the 95% level. Results for residence in close proximity to both a main road and petrol station were inconsistent, but there were few. The influence of socioeconomic factors as represented by the Townsend deprivation index on leukaemia incidence was not significant and the results were not explicable on the basis of impact of social class. CONCLUSIONS: The results are suggestive of a small increase in risk of childhood leukaemia, but not solid tumours, for those living in close proximity to a main road or petrol station. This increase in risk is not, however, significant and a larger study is warranted to establish the true risk and causes of any increase in risk.
Authors: R A Rinsky; A B Smith; R Hornung; T G Filloon; R J Young; A H Okun; P J Landrigan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1987-04-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronald H White; John D Spengler; Kumkum M Dilwali; Brenda E Barry; Jonathan M Samet Journal: Arch Environ Occup Health Date: 2005 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.663
Authors: Tommaso Filippini; Julia E Heck; Carlotta Malagoli; Cinzia Del Giovane; Marco Vinceti Journal: J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: C Steffen; M F Auclerc; A Auvrignon; A Baruchel; K Kebaili; A Lambilliotte; G Leverger; D Sommelet; E Vilmer; D Hémon; J Clavel Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Amanda E Janitz; Janis E Campbell; Sheryl Magzamen; Anne Pate; Julie A Stoner; Jennifer D Peck Journal: Environ Res Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Ben D Spycher; Martin Feller; Martin Röösli; Roland A Ammann; Manuel Diezi; Matthias Egger; Claudia E Kuehni Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 8.082