Literature DB >> 10655218

Self-inflicted wounds, template-directed gap repair and a recombination hotspot. Effects of the mariner transposase.

A R Lohe1, C Timmons, I Beerman, E R Lozovskaya, D L Hartl.   

Abstract

Aberrant repair products of mariner transposition occur at a frequency of approximately 1/500 per target element per generation. Among 100 such mutations in the nonautonomous element peach, most had aberrations in the 5' end of peach (40 alleles), in the 3' end of peach (11 alleles), or a deletion of peach with or without deletion of flanking genomic DNA (29 alleles). Most mariner mutations can be explained by exonuclease "nibble" and host-mediated repair of the double-stranded gap created by the transposase, in contrast to analogous mutations in the P element. In mariner, mutations in the 5' inverted repeat are smaller and more frequent than those in the 3' inverted repeat, but secondary mutations in target elements with a 5' lesion usually had 3' lesions resembling those normally found at the 5' end. We suggest that the mariner transposase distinguishes between the 5' and 3' ends of the element, and that the 5' end is relatively more protected after strand scission. We also find: (1) that homolog-dependent gap repair is a frequent accompaniment to mariner excision, estimated as 30% of all excision events; and (2) that mariner is a hotspot of recombination in Drosophila females, but only in the presence of functional transposase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10655218      PMCID: PMC1460940     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  28 in total

1.  The accumulation of P-element-induced recombinants in the germline of male Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M M Tanaka; X M Liang; Y H Gray; J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Modern thoughts on an ancyent marinere: function, evolution, regulation.

Authors:  D L Hartl; A R Lohe; E R Lozovskaya
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Autoregulation of mariner transposase activity by overproduction and dominant-negative complementation.

Authors:  A R Lohe; D L Hartl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Mutations in the mariner transposase: the D,D(35)E consensus sequence is nonfunctional.

Authors:  A R Lohe; D De Aguiar; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The mechanism of transposition of Tc3 in C. elegans.

Authors:  H G van Luenen; S D Colloms; R H Plasterk
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-10-21       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Structures of P transposable elements and their sites of insertion and excision in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  K O'Hare; G M Rubin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Molecular structure of a somatically unstable transposable element in Drosophila.

Authors:  J W Jacobson; M M Medhora; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Five major subfamilies of mariner transposable elements in insects, including the Mediterranean fruit fly, and related arthropods.

Authors:  H M Robertson; E G MacLeod
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.585

9.  Subunit interactions in the mariner transposase.

Authors:  A R Lohe; D T Sullivan; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Characterization of Soymar1, a mariner element in soybean.

Authors:  T Jarvik; K G Lark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  18 in total

1.  Discovery of the transposable element mariner.

Authors:  D Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Efficient mobilization of mariner in vivo requires multiple internal sequences.

Authors:  Allan R Lohe; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Early intermediates of mariner transposition: catalysis without synapsis of the transposon ends suggests a novel architecture of the synaptic complex.

Authors:  Karen Lipkow; Nicolas Buisine; David J Lampe; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The impact of dissociation on transposon-mediated disease control strategies.

Authors:  John M Marshall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Target capture during Mos1 transposition.

Authors:  Aude Pflieger; Jerôme Jaillet; Agnès Petit; Corinne Augé-Gouillou; Sylvaine Renault
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Gene therapy vectors: the prospects and potentials of the cut-and-paste transposons.

Authors:  Corentin Claeys Bouuaert; Ronald M Chalmers
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Physical properties of DNA components affecting the transposition efficiency of the mariner Mos1 element.

Authors:  Sophie Casteret; Najat Chbab; Jeanne Cambefort; Corinne Augé-Gouillou; Yves Bigot; Florence Rouleux-Bonnin
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  The ancient mariner sails again: transposition of the human Hsmar1 element by a reconstructed transposase and activities of the SETMAR protein on transposon ends.

Authors:  Csaba Miskey; Balázs Papp; Lajos Mátés; Ludivine Sinzelle; Heiko Keller; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Zoltán Ivics
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Molecular characterization of two natural hotspots in the Drosophila buzzatii genome induced by transposon insertions.

Authors:  M Cáceres; M Puig; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Continuous exchange of sequence information between dispersed Tc1 transposons in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome.

Authors:  Sylvia E J Fischer; Erno Wienholds; Ronald H A Plasterk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.