Literature DB >> 10654261

Molecular evolution in a multisite nearly neutral mutation model.

H Tachida1.   

Abstract

A simple nearly neutral mutation model of protein evolution was studied using computer simulation assuming a constant population size. In this model, a gene consists of a finite number of codons and there is no recombination within a gene. Each codon has two replacement and one silent sites. The fitness of a gene was determined multiplicatively by amino acids specified by codons (the independent multicodon model). Nucleotide diversity at replacement sites decreases as selection becomes stronger. A reduction of nucleotide diversity at silent sites also occurs as selection intensifies but the magnitude of the reduction is not a monotone function of the intensity of selection. The dispersion index is close to one. The average value of Tajima's and Fu and Li's statistics are negative and their absolute values increases as selection intensifies. However, their powers of detecting selection under the present model were not high unless the number of sites is large or mutation rate is high. The MK test was shown to detect intermediate selection fairly well. For comparison, the house-of-cards model was also investigated and its behavior was shown to be more sensitive to changes of population size than that of the independent multicodon model. The relevance of the present model for explaining protein evolution was discussed comparing its prediction and recent DNA data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10654261     DOI: 10.1007/s002399910008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  19 in total

1.  Muller's ratchet and the pattern of variation at a neutral locus.

Authors:  Isabel Gordo; Arcadio Navarro; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The nearly neutral and selection theories of molecular evolution under the fisher geometrical framework: substitution rate, population size, and complexity.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Darko Cotoras; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Simulation of DNA sequence evolution under models of recent directional selection.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim; Thomas Wiehe
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Energy-dependent fitness: a quantitative model for the evolution of yeast transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Ville Mustonen; Justin Kinney; Curtis G Callan; Michael Lässig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gene genealogies strongly distorted by weakly interfering mutations in constant environments.

Authors:  Jon Seger; Wendy A Smith; Jarom J Perry; Jessalynn Hunn; Zofia A Kaliszewska; Luciano La Sala; Luciana Pozzi; Victoria J Rowntree; Frederick R Adler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  DNA variation in a conifer, Cryptomeria japonica (Cupressaceae sensu lato).

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kado; Hiroshi Yoshimaru; Yoshihiko Tsumura; Hidenori Tachida
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Linkage disequilibrium patterns across a recombination gradient in African Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto; Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.